| Importance |
Criteria |
Example |
| Top | The subject is extremely important, even crucial, to its specific field. Reserved for more general, broad ideas, including theories, frameworks, concepts, and approaches that are more critical to the field of Information Architecture and more widely known outside the field. |
Information architecture |
| High | The subject is extremely notable, but has not achieved a more universal notability or critical status. This may include issues that are important but not widely known outside the field such as specific methods, methodologies, processes, technologies or techniques, or well-known researchers within the field. |
Wire Frames |
| Mid | The subject is primarily notable within the field of Information Architecture, but is less widely known outside of it. This may include specific technologies, tools, sub-topics in IA, or specific organizations or companies. |
Findability |
| Low | The subject is not particularly notable or significant even within the field of Information Architecture, and is possibly only included to cover a specific part of another notable article. This may include standards, specific jobs, or other articles too broad to be highly relevant within the specific field of IA. |
Embodied cognition Information foraging |
| NA | Subject importance is not applicable. Generally applies to non-article pages such as redirects, categories, templates, etc. |
Information Architecture articles |
| ??? | Subject importance has not yet been assessed. |
??? |
|
