Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/Ontario Highway 402
Ontario Highway 402 edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Toolbox |
---|
Ontario Highway 402 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) review
- Suggestion: Promote to A-Class
- Nominator's comments: In hopes of bridging the line of Featured articles between Michigan and New York, I present Highway 402 for review! It's been a couple years since this went through GAN, so it may need tweaking. If you spot a full paragraph that seems wonky, just point out which one and I'll do a rewrite of it. Overall, however, it is high quality, comprehensive, and well sourced.
- Nominated by: Floydian τ ¢ 21:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- First comment occurred: 03:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Review by Dough4872 edit
Review by Dough4872
|
---|
Comments:
|
- Support - Article looks good now. Dough4872 01:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support - Article is well written and has good structure. Haljackey (talk) 23:50, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
Review by Fredddie edit
Review by Fredddie
|
---|
Let's have a look. –Fredddie™ 04:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
|
Support –Fredddie™ 18:22, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
Review by Admrboltz edit
Image review by Admrboltz
|
---|
|
Images all check out. --AdmrBoltz 04:17, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Prose review by Admrboltz
|
---|
So... I am going to be nitpicky... since I can't find all that much wrong with it...
--AdmrBoltz 18:00, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
|
- Support - Looks good. I am at 1280 x 1024 and don't have issues. You're probably safe to remove the clear. --AdmrBoltz 19:12, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Spotcheck by Rschen7754
|
---|
The results of the spotcheck are a bit disappointing, in particular source 3 and 20. Please go through the entire article and make sure that all statements are backed up by sources, and post here when you have done so. In addition, I am happening to notice stuff that should have been pointed out by other reviewers, and am uncomfortable with signing off on a spotcheck when there could be other issues. Thus, in order to uphold our high standards at ACR, I will be conducting a fourth review of the article, and will be procedurally
|
Review by Rschen7754
|
---|
Should be good for a support after this. --Rschen7754 20:34, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
|