Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/Interstate 470 (Missouri)

Interstate 470 (Missouri) edit

Nominator requested to withdraw this over IRC. --Rs chen 7754 04:46, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Suggestion: Promote to A-Class

Nominator's comments: This is the second time that this article has appeared here. The first time, it stalled because the main contributor disappeared. Since that seems to be the case again, I will be bold and renominate. –Fredddie ™ 03:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated by: –Fredddie ™ 03:38, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First comment occurred: 04:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Image review by Rschen7754 edit

File:I-470 MO map.svg - CC-BY-SA 2.0, GFDL, sources noted
File:I-470 MO WB at I-70 EB exit.jpg - Flickr, CC-BY-SA 2.0
File:Kansas City, Missouri 1955 Yellow Book.jpg - PD-US-Gov

Done --Rs chen 7754 04:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess what's kept me from reviewing this is I'm not sure that the issues from the last review were resolved - Fredddie, would you mind taking a look? --Rs chen 7754 02:51, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I wanted to pretend that the first one never happened. So, review away. –Fredddie ™ 03:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Back during the first review after the nominator vanished, I considered fixing all the issues myself and supporting. However, there is a serious factual error: the first "existed" date is wrong. When I looked at the MoDOT maps back to 1967, I-470 was still there. --Rs chen 7754 03:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I guess to clarify my position, I do want to do a full review, but I am worried that if there is such a significant factual error in the article, that there may be more and the article may need to be significantly revised - I'd prefer that this was resolved first. --Rs chen 7754 05:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that what reviews are for? T C N7JM 05:20, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I just don't like reviewing moving targets. --Rs chen 7754 05:23, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't exactly have access to Kansas City Star or MoDOT archives, otherwise I'd have an answer by now. What I have from newspapers.com isn't exactly clear. –Fredddie ™ 06:09, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This was four years ago, but what I think I did was click on the link to the 1970 map, and change the URL to say 1967, and that's how I saw the older maps. --Rs chen 7754 06:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review by TCN7JM edit

I was going to say I always like taking a look at articles for roads I've driven on, but then I realized I haven't actually been on this one. Oh well. I guess I'll make my excuse that I have somewhat close relatives in Kansas City.

I'd like to review this, but the issue is whether or not I'll find the time. If somebody wants to review I-470 before I get the chance, go right ahead and jump me. T C N7JM 03:52, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to note that I have not reviewed this article yet because the nominator expressed to me on IRC that he would prefer I wait until he gets a couple of facts on the article checked. Once I get the green light, I'll go ahead and get started. T C N7JM 06:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This will need a source review to pass ACR, along with a spotcheck and 3 full reviews (last ACR closed 27 December 2013, and nominator only has 2 FAs unfortunately, just missing the cutoff). --Rs chen 7754 04:21, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.