Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 March 26

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< March 25 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 27 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 26

edit

09:04, 26 March 2024 review of submission by Seeners

edit

Hello

Kindly let me know what can be added to make the topic notable. Seeners (talk) 09:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is your association with her, since you took her picture?
Rejection typically means there is nothing more that can be done. You have summarized her activities, but Wikipedia articles must do more, they must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage choose to say about her, showing how she meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. You've said what she's done, but not described what sources see as her particular influence/importance/significance. If you can do that, you should first appeal to the last reviewer directly. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:53, 26 March 2024 review of submission by Shahvishal0106

edit

I have created the page for MoneyView. Previously, it was not showing any content, but now it's displaying. There is already one page. Can someone guide me on how to merge the content and make the page live? Shahvishal0106 (talk) 13:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Shahvishal0106: it's a manual editing process, you just need to compare the draft to the published article, identify what relevant and well-referenced new information the draft provides, and add that to the article. (The draft should remain as it is, there is no need to edit that any further.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
The article you are asking me to merge looks like promotional content. Should I replace the article and publish my content directly? Shahvishal0106 (talk) 05:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:47, 26 March 2024 review of submission by Aisha saleh Hadejia

edit

i want to contribute more and more Aisha saleh Hadejia (talk) 14:47, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

whta the problems with article help me guide me how can i solved it Aisha saleh Hadejia (talk) 14:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your draft User:Aisha saleh Hadejia/sandbox has no usable content? Theroadislong (talk) 14:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Theroadislong, I am going to block this editor for their obvious UPE/COI editing, and for their, eh, well see WP:CIR. Drmies (talk) 14:58, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok but it useful to young politician in Nigeria they can see how can the improve there works Aisha Saleh Fantai (talk) 15:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It sounds as if you have the common misunderstanding that Wikipedia has anything at all to do with how somebody presents themselves on the internet. A Wikipedia article is not in any way for the benefit of its subject, except incidentally: it is not controlled by its subject and (particularly if there is any controversy involving the subject) it may say things that the subject would not want. ColinFine (talk) 12:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

15:24, 26 March 2024 review of submission by Hachi1F2345

edit

Why Was My Page Draft Nathaniel WIlliams Declined Could you Help Like Dose this need Media Coverage and Sources Could you Help Thanks? Hachi1F2345 (talk) 15:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hachi1F2345: this draft was declined for the reasons given in the decline notice, namely a) it is unreferenced, and b) there is no evidence of notability. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:32, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you Guy help me with my Draft Hachi1F2345 (talk) 15:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17:03, 26 March 2024 review of submission by TheRealLee5555

edit

This article was declined and it was suggested it needed multiple sources that meet the four criteria. However, every sentence (with the exception of one that did not have a third party source, but had a publicly-issued news release) in the article was referenced to a third-party source (ie secondary and independent - two of the criteria) that were recognized industry or business publications or sites (ie in-depth and reliable). I would appreciate understanding how I can improve the references so the article can be published. This company is mentioned on a Wikipedia page (List of REITS in Canada) and the reason for this page is to provide information to link to that Wikipedia page so there is more fulsome information. The information on the submission is strictly factual and objective. TheRealLee5555 (talk) 17:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • It looks like a run of the mill kind of write-up of a company lacking proper sourcing. No, things like this and this cannot be called independent, secondary sources. They look like press releases/Rolodex entries, with prose and perhaps date likely supplied by the company itself. This is another one of those "profiles", and this this, and this look like the trade journal-version of a press release. That leaves the press release on the company's own website, and finally this, which looks (as far as I can see it) like a news item in a trade publication from the CoStar Group, and that will not go far in terms of notability. Drmies (talk) 17:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for your assistance. I am not clear on why trade publications are not considered reliable third party references. Can you please elaborate? They provide significant coverage, are independent, reliable and secondary. So Car & Driver magazine would not be considered a reliable source for a car company because it is a trade magazine? I get that the company news release is not, but there was no other third party source for that information and I have seen other Wiki pages use a company's website profile or release for one or two references. TheRealLee5555 (talk) 17:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    As for what other articles do: that is not relevant. We evaluate a draft on its own merits. Unfortunately Wikipedia has many thousands of seriously substandard articles, which would not be accepted if they were submitted for review today. Ideally, somebody would go through these improving them or deleting them, but as this is a volunteer project, it doesn't happen. See OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. ColinFine (talk) 12:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TheRealLee5555: for a source to count towards WP:GNG / WP:NCORP notability, it must be at once reliable and independent and secondary and provide significant coverage of the subject. I don't believe any of the sources cited in this draft meet all those criteria. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:11, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:33, 26 March 2024 review of submission by Mojdotcom

edit

Please help me improve to the right level. I will appreciate every advice! 

Mojdotcom (talk) 19:33, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Mojdotcom: this draft has been rejected outright, and is pending speedy deletion. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:45, 26 March 2024 review of submission by Sameem razs

edit

Wanted to get published the details on Karnataka Book of Records to help people to showcase there talent Sameem razs (talk) 19:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia isn't here to "showcase talent", it's here to have articles. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 21:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20:54, 26 March 2024 review of submission by Northfox2019

edit

How to create proper blog. i want to create informative blog only. Northfox2019 (talk) 20:54, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encyclopaedia not a blog publisher. Theroadislong (talk) 21:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20:57, 26 March 2024 review of submission by Northfox2019

edit

I have been trying to make a article on our company Keyos Beauty, but it's been rejected, can you please let me know what I should do to make the page live on Wikipedia Northfox2019 (talk) 20:57, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing you can do your company clearly doesn't pass WP:NCORP so doesn't warrant an article at this time. Theroadislong (talk) 21:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OP now blocked for promotion. 331dot (talk) 09:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2024_March_26&oldid=1216604161"