Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 September 29

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< September 28 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 30 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 29

edit

03:01, 29 September 2023 review of submission by AfnanzafarBD

edit

Need a help to review my re-submission after revising the comments. AfnanzafarBD (talk) 03:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@AfnanzafarBD: it will be reviewed once a reviewer picks it up, which can be days, weeks or even months from now; please be patient. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

06:48, 29 September 2023 review of submission by Cydricks27

edit

To post it on Google so everyone can search Cydricks27 (talk) 06:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has no interest in promoting you on Google, your draft gives zero indication of any notability. Theroadislong (talk) 07:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

08:39, 29 September 2023 review of submission by Jorgefdez7777

edit

I keep getting messages of COI, I don´t know what to change now Jorgefdez7777 (talk) 08:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jorgefdez7777 What is your connection with Marta Maldonado? You must have one since you took an image of her in her studio. 331dot (talk) 08:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
She has been my art professor for more than ten years. I also do web pages so i have done her webpage www.martamaldonado.com Jorgefdez7777 (talk) 09:32, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So she's more than someone you admire(as you state on your user page). At a minimum, you need to declare a conflict of interest(click for instructions). If you are compensated by her for creating her website and/or editing for her, you must make a paid editing disclosure. The compensation does not have to be money, it can be a grade, consideration for a job, or anything at all you receive for your editing or website work. 331dot (talk) 09:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I do not get paid by her in any way, i am not professional. I do it a favor and as a student getting into new projects is good. I will state the COI... Jorgefdez7777 (talk) 09:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. The main issue with the draft is that it is not written in an encyclopedic style. I would suggest that you look at some articles about artists(preferably those classified as good) to get an idea of what is being looked for.
Not related to the draft itself, but it's curious that she would want to release her work under Wikipedia's license, which permits reuse for any purpose with attribution- this would mean people could take copies of this work and sell them(say, printed on clothing) and she would not be entitled to any money from the use of her work. However, this is certainly her choice. 331dot (talk) 09:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

09:30, 29 September 2023 review of submission by Shamoonahmadham

edit

You can Google all the information regarding this article and everything posted here in Wikipedia is true to its form Thankyou again Shamoonahmadham (talk) 09:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place for you to tell the world about yourself and what you do, please read the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 09:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My article was 100 percent genuine sir. With news references media links and many more Shamoonahmadham (talk) 09:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create a new section for every post you make, please just edit this existing section. Again, your draft was rejected which means it will not be considered any more. How "genuine" it is is not relevant. 331dot (talk) 09:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11:55, 29 September 2023 review of submission by Tomasz11234

edit

We need to add the Ludigames page on Wikipedia right now! Tomasz11234 (talk) 11:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tomasz11234 Who is "we", and what is the urgency? Your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 11:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Tomasz11234. I rejected your draft. You provided zero sources that demonstrated how Ludigames meets the WP:NORG criteria. All of your sources were WP:PRIMARY. Wikipedia is not a business or game directory, please see WP:NOT. Qcne (talk) 12:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

17:13, 29 September 2023 review of submission by Maria Andreina Francisco

edit

I'm not sure I understand the reasons for rejection. womENcourage is an event similar to Richard Tapia Celebration of Diversity in Computing and Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing (although it's newer). I've tried following the same structure and style as the other events hoping that's what it should look like and I would really appreciate some more specific tips to get it accepted. Maria Andreina Francisco (talk) 17:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Andreina Francisco We don't need the whole URL when you link to another Wikipedia article or page, simply place the title of the target page in double brackets, as I've done here.
Your draft was declined, not rejected. "Rejected" has a specific meaning here, that a draft may not be resubmitted. Declined means that a draft may be resubmitted.
Please read other stuff exists. The existence of other articles has little bearing on your draft. It could be that these other articles are also inappropriate and simply not addressed yet. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to go undetected, even for years. We can only address what we know about. If you want to use other articles as a model, use those classified as good articles, which have been checked by the community.
The main issue with your draft is does little more than tell of the existence of this conference. An article must summarize what independent reliable sources say is important/significant/influential about this event- what we call notability(see the definition of a notable event). 331dot (talk) 17:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The first article you mention has been marked as problematic since 2016, and shouldn't be used as a model. 331dot (talk) 17:31, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

17:58, 29 September 2023 review of submission by Darius Rawson

edit

I Need My Wiki Created Darius Rawson (talk) 17:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you mean the "draft article" about your business I have tagged it for speedy deletion, it clearly doesn't pass WP:NCORP and is entirely promotional. Theroadislong (talk) 18:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

19:26, 29 September 2023 review of submission by Jlfranzasu

edit

Curious about the review status on this article. This is for an academic and the last round of edits were based on feedback from the reviewer/editor who said "These are both very minor things and I think as soon as they're done there's no reason why this couldn't be accepted." Please advise. Jlfranzasu (talk) 19:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft is pending. As noted on your draft, a review "may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,579 pending submissions waiting for review." Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 19:29, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

20:53, 29 September 2023 review of submission by Wofoz

edit

Hi. I've done some edits on this, correcting the 'too many citations' comment. But the option for saving seems only to be 'publish' which I don't want to do as I need someone to review this due to my COI. Would you please let me know how I can do this properly? Thank you! 

Wofoz (talk) 20:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Publish changes" should be understood to mean "save", it does not mean "publish this to the encyclopedia". You have submtted the draft. 331dot (talk) 22:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

22:03, 29 September 2023 review of submission by Tomasz11234

edit

We need to add a Wikipedia page for this iOS game Tomasz11234 (talk) 22:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who is we? The draft was rejected, and will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 22:17, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

23:30, 29 September 2023 review of submission by Xm4729

edit

How can I get this re-reviewed? I previously got help and reviewed low quality sources and such. Xm4729 (talk) 23:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Xm4729: this has been resubmitted, is awaiting review, and will be reviewed when a reviewer happens to pick it up; please be patient. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2023_September_29&oldid=1178655054"