Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 October 29

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< October 28 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 30 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


October 29

edit

12:40, 29 October 2023 review of submission by Moonotth

edit

Why it cannot be posted? Moonotth (talk) 12:40, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Moonotth: because this is not a valid draft for an encyclopaedia article, it is a series of very long lists of bullet points, with insufficient referencing. You may be able to draft an acceptable article about this topic, but this wasn't it. Please see WP:YFA and WP:REFB for advice on article creation and referencing, respectively. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:44, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, the article needs to be reformatted as it appears to be a few long run-on paragraphs. @DoubleGrazingis the expert though. JoeK2033 (talk) 21:41, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

13:16, 29 October 2023 review of submission by Tonny Graphix

edit

Hello, My submission has been rejected, I want to know what the problem is Tonny Graphix (talk) 13:16, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Tonny Graphix. Why did you completely ignore my previous two declines where I told you your draft was written in a completely inappropriate way for Wikipedia?
In any case, there is zero evidence you meet our special definition of a notable person, the criteria is at [WP:GNG]]. Qcne (talk) 13:23, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Tonny Graphix Can I view the draft? Could I improve it by after finding reliable sources? JoeK2033 (talk) 21:44, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It was deleted as advertising. Perhaps it could be rewritten from scratch. But what was there looked autobiographical material that would not have sources to support the statements. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:10, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

13:18, 29 October 2023 review of submission by 5.122.222.159

edit

سلام مشکل مقاله من چی است که شما رد کرده اید؟ 5.122.222.159 (talk) 13:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft was completely unsourced and was not in English. There is no evidence of notability under WP:GNG. Qcne (talk) 13:22, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree on this 100%. JoeK2033 (talk) 21:45, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

13:29, 29 October 2023 review of submission by 5.122.222.159

edit

من چطوری باید موضوع و داغ کنم؟ 5.122.222.159 (talk) 13:29, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have rejected your draft, there is nothing else you can do. Qcne (talk) 13:31, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

13:34, 29 October 2023 review of submission by Sidhxyz

edit

JUST I WANT TO PUBLISH MY ARTICLE Sidhxyz (talk) 13:34, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sidhxyz I fixed your link, you need the "Draft:" included. Your draft was rejected and will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not the place for people to tell the world about themselves, please read the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 13:39, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is written in the first-person point of view without any sources, making it unfit for publishing.@Sidhxyz, Good call @331dot. JoeK2033 (talk) 21:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

18:38, 29 October 2023 review of submission by 50.187.77.85

edit

My article was rejected because of the references not being good enough but I'm unclear as to why. 50.187.77.85 (talk) 18:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IP editor. Your draft was only declined, not rejected. Articles about movies must pass our special notability criteria which you can find at WP:GNG. You have two sources: IMDb is unreliable so cannot be used to establish notability. dmtalkies works as a source, but we'd need more than one source to establish notability. Qcne (talk) 18:44, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Qcne IMDb is not reliable as a source because it can be edited, yes. However, this article could qualify because it's well-written and international, so the chance that the NYT or Wall Street Journal will cover it is low. JoeK2033 (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21:38, 29 October 2023 review of submission by JoeK2033

edit

What do you mean when you say this? Thanks! JoeK2033 (talk) 21:38, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It means just what it says. Your draft is wholly inappropriate for an encyclopedia article. 331dot (talk) 21:43, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm so sorry! I didn't see the reference text. That is entirely inappropriate. Thank you for flagging this. @331dot JoeK2033 (talk) 21:55, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21:49, 29 October 2023 review of submission by Astroscobee

edit

Hello Guys,

Jenna Kerr is appearing on Ink Master (Season 15) please check Ink Masters Wiki as well as website.... There is much about this artist that needs to be documented here on Wikipedia, open for some help here.

Thank you Astro Astroscobee (talk) 21:49, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User-generated content such as wikis, including Wikipedia, are not reliable sources so should not be used and the same for commercial site that sell products (worldfamoustattooink.com, really?). Being on a television show in and of itself does equate to notability as Wikipedia defines it. Interviews/her comments are primary sources so cannot be used to establish notability, regardless of the source that publishes it. There is nothing in the draft that suggests Kerr can meet the notability, as talented as she may be. S0091 (talk) 22:07, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

22:49, 29 October 2023 review of submission by FoxtrotAzad

edit

Dear Sir / Madam

I have made changes and updates on the article based on verified websites and news links. Need you to reconsider the article publication. Appreciate if you can assist. FoxtrotAzad (talk) 22:49, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to post a resume or a list of accomplishments; we need to know what independent reliable sources consider to be notable as defined by Wikipedia about this person, not merely what their accomplishments are. 331dot (talk) 07:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2023_October_29&oldid=1183396860"