Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 September 12

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< September 11 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 13 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 12

edit

08:16:13, 12 September 2022 review of draft by 91.106.36.249

edit


Can I get help from someone to modify this article to be accepted and published on wikipedia . this is my first project on Wikipedia . 91.106.36.249 (talk) 08:16, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now moot, as draft was deleted under G11 and G12. OP has been given GS/CRYPTO warning. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 08:48, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10:55:08, 12 September 2022 review of draft by İsa şahintürk

edit


İsa şahintürk (talk) 10:55, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is your question, @İsa şahintürk? This draft was declined because it isn't in English (among its other issues). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

11:52:12, 12 September 2022 review of submission by Prads999

edit

I am trying to publish a Wikipedia Page for the company KISSHT. I have also added a disclaimer in my profile as required by WIKIPEDIA. However the article submitted by me was rejected due to below reasons. Kindly help. "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified" "All the references are examples of trivial reporting, does nothing for notability" Prads999 (talk) 11:52, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Prads999: The draft has since been deleted as blatant and irreparable advertizing/promotion. Disclosure does not remove the requirement to write neutrally, and in fact this tends to be where most conflict of interest editors go wrong. Even the best writer shows their biases in their writing, and while you may not be able to see and recognise it someone who doesn't have this pre-existing connexion can and often will.
As to the matter of sourcing, we're looking for in-depth, non-routine, independent-of-the-subject news/scholarly sources written by identifiable authors and subjected to rigourous fact-checking. Name-drops, routine business news, and company profiles are all worthless as sources for this reason. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:25:01, 12 September 2022 review of submission by Toptoptop1111

edit

My article was rejected. Toptoptop1111 (talk) 14:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Toptoptop1111: your draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. The draft is highly promotional (see what Wikipedia is not, specifically Wikipedia is a means of promotion.) None of the references are considered reliable, independent, significant coverage. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:29, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(Draft deleted, user blocked.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:26, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:29:42, 12 September 2022 review of submission by Toptoptop1111

edit

I would like to know the reason why my article was rejected. Toptoptop1111 (talk) 14:29, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Toptoptop1111 see above. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:33:00, 12 September 2022 review of draft by JenniferRose77

edit


I would just like to know if there is anything I can do to improve this article or make it get approved faster. This is my first article. Thank you for your help!

JenniferRose77 (talk) 14:33, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

JenniferRose77 Drafts are reviewed in no particular order by volunteers, doing what they can when they can. There isn't anything you can really do to speed up the process. Please be patient- as noted on your draft, it could take some time. 331dot (talk) 15:11, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JenniferRose77: I took a quick look at the article, and don't see how the chief is notable. Just being a police chief isn't enough. Has he done anything unique that has gotten him media coverage, besides being hired and retiring? TechnoTalk (talk) 00:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:20:06, 12 September 2022 review of submission by Billatek

edit


16:20:06, 12 September 2022 review of submission by Billatek



Decorpot(Company) Decorpot is a Bangalore-based interior design company with professional experts who deliver the highest level of excellence. Founded in 2015, the firm focuses on providing high-quality home interiors while operating across India. They use German technology and machinery for accuracy and precision. They offer a solution to formatting, edge-banding, soft forming, post forming and shaped parts through feed machines.

@Billatek: what is your question? This draft, such as it is, has been rejected and won't be considered further. Please see WP:YFA for advice on creating an article. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:27, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
and this Draft:Decorpot is just blatant advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 16:29, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

18:53:10, 12 September 2022 review of draft by Rocky.perera

edit


Rocky.perera (talk) 18:53, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am the Senior Marketing Manager for Merrithew. We are working towards updating the company information on Wikipedia. Is there someone on Wikipedia's end we can speak to to help facilitate this? Please advise on the best next step for us in this process to ensure successful submission/approval of our updated page.

@Rocky.perera: I am going to be VERY blunt: DISCLOSE YOUR EMPLOYMENT. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As to the article, with the exception of the WSJ Magazine source (can't assess - walled) the lot of your sources are useless for notability (in order: too sparse, wrong subject, too sparse, website homepage, deprecated, too sparse x2, website homepage x2, connexion to subject). Even if that Wall Street Journal source is usable it cannot support an article by itself.
Since the sources are junk (and barring a significant improvement on that front) anything written in the article matters only for determining if speedy deletion criterion G11 (blatant and irreparable advertizing/promotion) applies - and it very much does, reading more like an extended advertizement for the company than a clinical encyclopaedia article. Don't try to use Wikipedia in your marketing strategy; we don't like it. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:53, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Rocky.perera: You may be aware by now that your company article has been deleted for violating Wikipedia's policy forbidding blatant advertising. There are likely other similar advertising-like articles on the encyclopedia, but that just means they have not been addressed yet. The important thing for you to know is that notability comes from identifying independent third party media sources. See WP:NCORP. I Googled the phrase Merrithew 30th anniversary and couldn't find a single article about the anniversary. I do see a passing mention in the WSJ that suggests your equipment is considered to be premium, but can't find other in-depth media coverage to substantiate notability. So that's the main issue. You are also discouraged from writing anything yourself. It's too hard to separate yourself from the marketing copy. If sufficient media coverage ever does develop, then a fan who is also an experienced editor will likely start an article for you. TechnoTalk (talk) 00:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 20:30:46, 12 September 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by ReaderK1967

edit


Hello, I created an article for creation and it was declined. I went back into the article, and updated the info based on the declination notes. Do I need to resubmit the article for it the be reviewed? Thank you

ReaderK1967 (talk) 20:30, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ReaderK1967: It looks like the article has already been been resubmitted. I made some improvements and removed some of the weaker primary sources. My recommendation is to not include any info that can't be independently sourced. Speaker bios don't count, since those are just reposted by the media without verification. I also removed announcements of appearances and readings, since those don't really show notability. TechnoTalk (talk) 23:37, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_September_12&oldid=1111035061"