Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 June 4

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< June 3 << May | June | Jul >> June 5 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 4

edit

04:03:39, 4 June 2022 review of draft by NeverTry4Me

edit


Can anyone please assess the draft and guide me further to work for the AFC acceptance! - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 04:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For quicker turnaround time, be WP:BOLD and publish. The whole community can assist at that point. AfC is setup to prevent junk from getting published & guide well-intentioned new editors, it's not equipped to help make decent articles better.Slywriter (talk) 04:10, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Slywriter I can't be WP:BOLD to move it as I am in condition laid by Administrator to create article for submission only. Hence, I'm asking for higher-level users' help for it. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 04:22, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, my apologies. Makes more sense now. In a more general sense, do have some concern with this board being used to notify reviewers of drafts being "ready" since it's not really a place to expedite review.Slywriter (talk) 04:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Slywriter I need assistance and guidance. I'm not asking anyone to accept the Draft. If the Draft is suitable, then it will be. I see the article person is notable for his heinous crimes. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 04:46, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@NeverTry4Me: I noticed the article has been resubmitted. I made some improvements that will hopefully help get it approved. It was a bit repetitive and overdramatic. You want the tone to be encyclopedic, despite how evil you think this person is. TechnoTalk (talk) 18:44, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
NeverTry4Me, I didn't check the sources but this needs a huge cleanup. I did some copyediting but I don't think this is enough. WP:NPOV should always be maintained when writing articles that include controversies or anything such. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 19:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

04:52:22, 4 June 2022 review of submission by Abdallah H. Riziki

edit


Abdallah H. Riziki (talk) 04:52, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Abdallah H. Riziki: what is your question? Your Draft:Abdallah H. Riziki autobio has been declined, because it is completely unreferenced. See WP:REFB for advice. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:17, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

06:20:22, 4 June 2022 review of submission by 88.113.214.36

edit


Do you have some proposals or suggestions what kind of content should be added in the article? There are lots of similar biographies of doctors (and people of other professions) available in Wikipedia like this, I don't see why this would not suffice?

88.113.214.36 (talk) 06:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This draft has been rejected, and will not be considered further. We do not review articles against the yardstick of whatever else may exist on Wikipedia, but rather against the relevant guidelines. In this case, the sources are nowhere near enough to establish the subject's notability per WP:GNG. So it isn't a question of adding more content, as such; it's a question of adding more and (significantly) better sources. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21:00:57, 4 June 2022 review of draft by KatrinKultur

edit


KatrinKultur (talk) 21:00, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KatrinKultur You don't ask a question. 331dot (talk) 21:07, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_June_4&oldid=1092558870"