Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 December 8

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< December 7 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 9 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 8

edit

14:28:35, 8 December 2022 review of draft by ARKGJL

edit


I am just wondering when you will be able to review this page. We are due to make a significant news announcement over the next month and are expecting a significant increase in searches for the company on Wikipedia so we're keen to ensure the information listed is clear. At present there is a lot of confusion between the company name (Academy of Robotics) and the name of one of our main products, Kar-go, and we would like to rectify this.

ARKGJL (talk) 14:28, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ARKGJL I must be frank- for which I apologize- but Wikipedia is not concerned with search results for your organization. We are also not concerned with any deadlines you are under. As noted on the draft, "This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,270 pending submissions waiting for review." There isn't a queue; volunteers pick drafts to review out of a category. There is no way to ensure a speedy review. Additionally, the purpose of a Wikipedia article is to summarize independent reliable sources, showing how it is a notable organization as defined by Wikipedia, not merely to document the existence of the company.
Furthermore, I see that you declared a conflict of interest, but you must make the stricter paid editing disclosure, a Terms of Use requirement and mandatory. 331dot (talk) 14:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ARKGJL: What 331dot said. And, to help you on your way, you get a Bastard helper from Hell critique. Note that I will be assessing both for Academy of Robotics and for Kar-go - notability for either is determined for that entity only.
My recommendation is that you split this into two separate articles - one for AoR and one for Kar-go - and to have a more realistic grasp of the timescale Wikipedia works on. We don't exist to do your PR for you; we want the article to be well-written and well-sourced and that's just not something we can do under strict external deadlines. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 16:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for reviewing these sources. I completely agree with your recommendation to split this into two separate articles and this is what I was hoping to do. There is an existing article on Wikipedia on Kar-go which I would like to update by removing most of the content about the Parent Company, Academy of Robotics, and simply link to the Academy of Robotics article. However, this will only make sense if there is an Academy of Robotics article to link to.
Regarding timescales, I apologise if I seemed to be putting pressure on the Wikipedia team. That wasn't my intention. I appreciate that you do an incredible job and it takes a long time to review articles properly. I merely wanted to give context to my request, but I had submitted the article for review in September so I was just checking to see if there was an update as the message suggested it takes 3 months or more. Apologies for any misunderstanding.
Regarding your feedback on this article
Please let me know if there is any further information I can help with and thanks once again for your time. ARKGJL (talk) 23:54, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ARKGJL: I detest sources that hide most of their content behind Javascript. I'll revise my statement on Verdict to "useless for notability for AoR (too sparse) and good for Kar-go". In re the CNN text, that is indeed the problem; the article doesn't credit Grez at all for the text anywhere that I can see (header, footer, etc.). Since the text is otherwise just as useful as the video with respect to AoR and Kar-go otherwise (The reason why I said it wasn't a transcript is for context; sometimes these pages are a video with the text transcript for deaf/blind users underneath) and you'd likely be citing that source anyway for Kar-go, I don't see this as too problematic overall. If need be, you would use {{cite news}} and add the journalist's name that way. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 14:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks for this feedback - very helpful and much appreciated. Should I revise the sources or the article or should I leave this to the editors' discretion? Apologies, for the novice question, but any advice on how I can support the next stage of review, would be very helpful! ARKGJL (talk) 14:19, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ARKGJL: I would get rid of the useless sources as described above - the longer the bad sources remain, the longer the draft is going to stay a draft. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 15:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17:07:40, 8 December 2022 review of draft by Presto222

edit


After editing my draft, I try to publish changes but nothing shows, rather it continues to display the mistakes and correction I need to make. Kindly help out.

Presto222 (talk) 17:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Presto222: Enable Javascript for wikipedia.org and wikimedia.org in your browser/addon settings. You're getting a CAPTCHA that is being interdicted because Javascript is disabled/blocked. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 17:09, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:44:50, 8 December 2022 review of submission by Klee Bakudan

edit


Klee Bakudan (talk) 22:44, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(Hoax-y draft, rejected, and now speedied.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:36, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

23:54:05, 8 December 2022 review of submission by BMA-Nation2020

edit


Sources say the film is in post-production. It should be fine for now. Can't it not be a draft right now and be as a page with some good sources? It has enough already. Not to mention it's coming in 2023 now.

BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 23:54, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BMA-Nation2020 Films are generally not notable until they are released, as you have already been told. Unless there is something very unusual about the production of the film itself(see Rust (upcoming film), where someone was killed in an accidental shooting), it won't merit an article until then. 331dot (talk) 12:36, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Or if a trailer comes out. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 15:46, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BMA-Nation2020 The notability guidelines definintely do not say that. Releasing a trailer is a standard activity and not unusual. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_December_8&oldid=1127333778"