Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 September 5

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< September 4 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 6 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 5

edit

05:28:25, 5 September 2021 review of draft by Friedl 11

edit


Hi, the Draft:Georg Sporschill was declined by 2 reasons: 1. missing formal tone / neutral point of view, 2. missing independent, reliable, published sources. Item 1: ok, I am working on it. Item 2: which sources are wrong? Many thanks for help, Friedl 11

Friedl 11 (talk) 05:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:02:35, 5 September 2021 review of submission by Johndamiano

edit


Johndamiano (talk) 08:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

this article is the biography of an emerging film star "larissa andrade". she is a Brazilian supermodel and currently working in the US film industry. i have provided sufficient references and links to prove the authenticity of this article. please re-review this article and approve it. this article deserves to be on wikipedia.

Johndamiano The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It's not "authenticity" that is the issue, but the special Wikipedia definition of notability, which it appears that this person does not meet. "Emerging" or "up and coming" talent rarely merits articles; persons must already be established to merit articles. 331dot (talk) 08:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:15:25, 5 September 2021 review of submission by Phtmarket

edit


Phtmarket (talk) 12:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

why is my article declined?

Phtmarket Your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further; the reason was given on the draft by reviewers. As it was rejected, it cannot be resubmitted. 331dot (talk) 12:46, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This subject is an activist and an entreprenuer in India, he definitely meets the notability criteria of Wikipedia.I have added engough references for the article, But it's being declined for no fault.Please help Phtmarket (talk) 12:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Phtmarket If you have additional comment, please edit this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. This is easier to do in the full desktop version of Wikipedia, even in a browser on your device. The app and mobile versions do not have full functionality. In a browser, scroll to the bottom and click "Desktop". You should then be able to edit this section. 331dot (talk) 12:50, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reviewer stated that the the subject is not present in the sources, but all the sources I have submitted are published in Telugu , a language spoken in the south of India, the reviewer is being very rude in her words.

Phtmarket I don't see any rudeness towards you. The sources do not establish that this person meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. While it is not required that sources be in English, if you use non-English sources in a language that is not common outside where you live, it's going to be harder to get a draft accepted. Just from looking at the URLs you provided, the sources seem to be routine, basic coverage, not significant, in depth coverage. Please see Your First Article; but the draft cannot be resubmitted at this time. 331dot (talk) 13:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please check out her talk page, she is being very inconsiderate and insensitive towards what I am trying to say. Please do allow me to resubmit the draft.

14:05:04, 5 September 2021 review of submission by Bolgerb1953

edit


Bolgerb1953 (talk) 14:05, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am trying to find out how to appeal a decision of a single reviewer to remove Stakeholder Capitalism, even though it is a term in very wide use today. Here is a search result showing lots of references. The reviewer is conflating Stakeholder Capitalism with Stakeholder Theory.

https://www.google.com/search?q=stakeholder+capitalism&sxsrf=AOaemvJTUAmJBF375-3YAUi_bWNn1GAl3A%3A1630850639059&source=hp&ei=Ts40YbLTPImq5NoP_PCe4AQ&iflsig=ALs-wAMAAAAAYTTcX4ZarXg11hl_fJY0LDgEu6sIJbxq&oq=&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAEYADIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCCMQ6gIQJzIHCCMQ6gIQJ1AAWABg0xVoAXAAeACAAQCIAQCSAQCYAQCwAQo&sclient=gws-wiz

Bolgerb1953 (talk) 14:05, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly the same topic as Stakeholder theory. Even the OP has said so: 'Added reference to the emerging concept of Stakeholder Capitalism, which is the more commonly used term today for the same concept.'. - MrOllie (talk) 14:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
User:Bolgerb1953 - You have raised this issue in at least four forums, at such great length that it will be difficult to try to answer you, on your talk page, at the Teahouse, here, and at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard (twice). I have closed your second filing at DRN. This AFC Help Desk is not the proper forum to discuss what is either a naming question or content fork question. I suggest that this thread be closed. I will also ask you, User:Bolgerb1953, to answer the question that you have filibustered on your talk page, which is whether you have a conflict of interest. That question should be answered before we can go any further to try to resolve this matter. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:27, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is now a thread open at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:17, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:15:51, 5 September 2021 review of submission by Durian1980

edit

The draft created was a film's page which is unique and I suppose it is notable. The references made was from leading news websites in India. Pls let me know why the draft is rejected. Thank you. Durian1980 (talk) 14:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Durian1980 The draft was only declined, not rejected. "Rejected" would mean that it cannot be reconsidered, but "declined" means that it can be reconsidered. Please see the message at the top of the draft left by the reviewer. 331dot (talk) 14:20, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:04:02, 5 September 2021 review of submission by MyNameIsIcycle

edit


MyNameIsIcycle (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply] 

Hello, Liance

I was wondering what i could add to my "Republic Of Arctossia" wiki article in order for it to be published. Thanks, MyNameIsIcycle

MyNameIsIcycle The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to tell about something that you created one day. Wikipedia summarizes what independent reliable sources state about a subject, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of notability. 331dot (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:07:36, 5 September 2021 review of draft by Lucas473

edit


Hi, would like to get help on the article.

The sources are relevant as well to describe the works. For example, nr. 4 are two clips from Swedish national TV (SVT) and a commercial national channel (TV4). They describe one of the artist's important works and its exhibition in the famous Gallery Gummesson (there is an article on that, where this article could be included as a link).

There are also references from English sources, like Associated Press (nr. 9) and CBC/Radio-Canada (nr. 10.).

I would like to get help how to better the article and get it published.

Kind Regards, Lucas473 Lucas473 (talk) 21:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:25:49, 5 September 2021 review of submission by Jfklaess

edit


Jfklaess (talk) 22:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_September_5&oldid=1043629658"