Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 November 14

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< November 13 << Oct | November | Dec >> November 15 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


November 14 edit

03:04:57, 14 November 2021 review of draft by Ornithoptera edit


Working on Draft:Falcon Lake Incident, on the mainspace it is a redirect to the list of Canadian UFO sightings but due to the amount of prolonged coverage of the event from independent sources even 57 years following the incident and the amount of material published regarding the event I do believe it warrants a separate page. I am unsure as to if the draft will be published as a result of the current redirect status of the mainspace article. Ornithoptera (talk) 03:04, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ornithoptera The existence of a redirect is of no significance. If the draft is accepted getting rid of the redirect is a trivial technicality. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:15, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your response Roger (Dodger67)! I was considering making a page for Louth (crater) which currently is a redirect, what is the proper way I should go about this? Ornithoptera (talk) 22:00, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ornithoptera just go ahead and create Draft:Louth (crater), the redirect is of no consequence. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 05:40, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Got it! Thank you for your advice! Ornithoptera (talk) 05:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:29:53, 14 November 2021 review of submission by 219.90.98.228 edit


IVE MADE CHANGES ACCORDING TO THE GUIDLINES AND WANT THIS COMPLETED ASAP SO THANK YOU MODERATORS. 219.90.98.228 (talk) 08:29, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 08:31, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not type in all capital letters, that is considered yelling. 331dot (talk) 08:32, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

in need to complete my project asap and i have made changes accordingly so can you pls check it again 219.90.98.228 (talk) 08:57, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you were told, the draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. If this was your project, it was unfair to give you such a project as whomever gave it to you could not guarantee that you would succeed. For additional comment, please edit this existing section, instead of creating additional sections. This is easier to do in full desktop mode in a browser on your device; the mobile and app versions do not have full functionality. 331dot (talk) 09:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If your project was from a educational facility, your instructors should review the Education program materials to learn how to design fairer assignments. 331dot (talk) 09:03, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:17:08, 14 November 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by 49.204.138.228 edit


Friends, recently I stumbled upon an Art Gallery organized by NGMA in Bangalore, India http://ngmaindia.gov.in/ngma_bangaluru.asp which is all about Upendra Maharathi and when I was looking information on Google, I couldn't see Wikipedia. Therefore, I need your help in writing an article on Upendra Maharathi, who is an artist extraordinaire http://www.artsillustrated.in/architecture/who-was-upendra-maharathi/ and here https://indianexpress.com/article/express-sunday-eye/an-artist-extraordinaire-upendra-maharathi-5992225/. He won many awards https://umsas.org.in/achievements/ & here https://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/art-and-culture/confessions-of-a-creative-mind/. Do let me know how can we help people know about this man.

Thank you 49.204.138.228 (talk) 10:17, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

49.204.138.228 (talk) 10:17, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please create a draft yourself using the wizard at WP:AFC. Often it is better to have an account, but it is not mandatory. Please read WP:YFA before starting FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 10:43, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 13:30:33, 14 November 2021 for further review and assistance on AfC submission by NewManila2000 edit


I just want to request for another review of the mentioned draft since I had added an information there after the AFC submission of the article was first rejected. Thanks. NewManila2000 (talk) 13:30, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NewManila2000 (talk) 13:30, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@NewManila2000 You have submitted it for review, and it will be reviewed in due course FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 14:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:27:28, 14 November 2021 review of draft by Godisawoman1 edit


Hi there! My draft got deleted. So, I wanted to know the reason behind rejection, is it about the sources I've attached or the language used in my article, since i'm new to this, and I really want to make a significant contribution to this community. Godisawoman1 (talk) 15:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:07:57, 14 November 2021 review of submission by Msftstar edit


Msftstar (talk) 16:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All of your sources are useless. We don't cite social media or streaming websites, and government documents are primary sources. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 17:09, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:42:17, 14 November 2021 review of submission by PeelyMan edit

19:42:17, 14 November 2021 review of submission by PeelyMan

PeelyMan (talk) 19:42, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@PeelyMan: No sources, no article, no debate. We also do not speculate on how subjects are connected. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 19:46, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your draft was rejected your topic is not notable, you have removed the rejection notice but this will not help. Theroadislong (talk) 19:56, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

20:05:20, 14 November 2021 review of submission by 2601:241:480:6340:0:0:0:BD0C edit


2601:241:480:6340:0:0:0:BD0C (talk) 20:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I wanted to updated that Kale My Name has 61K followers now and that Tabitha Brown announced opening of Los Angeles location end of the month. But it says it’s not notable enough? It’s currently in 300 news articles and it got over million views. Please do not deny veganisam and Kale My Name as something not notable, because this is huge.

It could have 61 million followers and it still might not be notable, notability is assessed by the quality of reliable independent sources that have discussed the topic. Theroadislong (talk) 20:11, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:18:29, 14 November 2021 review of submission by PrinceJoshie edit


PrinceJoshie (talk) 22:18, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

22:33:47, 14 November 2021 review of draft by EcheveriaJ edit


Hi, I created an "article" and submitted it but was declined. This article was meant to be more as a neat place to find different sampling techniques - a list. Hence, as it is a list, it doesn't really need citations as it is just a convenient place to group things together. What edits would make this clear? Many thanks --EcheveriaJ (talk) 22:33, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

EcheveriaJ (talk) 22:33, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EcheveriaJ. Your statement, "as it is a list, it doesn't really need citations", isn't really true. Stand-alone lists are a type of article. Wikipedia's verifiability policy applies to them, and they should be sourced. I've left a more detailed comment on the draft.
You also may find Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists helpful. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Worldbruce Thank you for your advice, they are really helpful in guiding me as to how I could make it ready for the mainspace. Thanks! --EcheveriaJ (talk) 20:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
In looking for sources, would textbooks for high schools be appropriate? Thanks --EcheveriaJ (talk) 20:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@EcheveriaJ: Wikipedia:Reliable sources recommends textbooks generally. It mentions "introductory-level university textbooks" and "widely recognised standard textbooks written by experts in a field" specifically. A few textbooks of any kind should be sufficient to get the draft approved, but I think you'll find the topic covered more thoroughly in textbooks aimed at college freshmen and sophomores. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_November_14&oldid=1056165093"