Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 March 28

Help desk
< March 27 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 29 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 28 edit

02:38:13, 28 March 2021 review of submission by Downsize43 edit

Draft:List of tourist drives in Queensland This Draft was submitted last November, and I would like to know when it will be reviewed. Downsize43 (talk) 02:38, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Downsize43   Accepted I'm afraid sometimes even a straightforward acceptance takes a while. There is a huge backlog. Fiddle Faddle 07:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:59:33, 28 March 2021 review of submission by 2A02:8109:9880:7598:C0D6:AD1C:DCC9:CED8 edit


2A02:8109:9880:7598:C0D6:AD1C:DCC9:CED8 (talk) 09:59, 28 March 2021 (UTC) My article on IKAR INDUSTRIES was declined, even it included a lot references related to the article. What else ca I do, to get notification?[reply]

Wikipedia is not interested in what a subject wants to say about themselves, we are interested in what independent sources have written about a subject. Victor Schmidt (talk) 10:26, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:22:47, 28 March 2021 review of submission by 194.223.56.83 edit


The Australian Financial Review is a prominent secondary source that demonstrates notability

194.223.56.83 (talk) 13:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello IP, the draft has been rejected by Hatchens. It will not be considered any further. Thank you! –Hulgedtalk⟩ 13:32, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

14:22:52, 28 March 2021 review of submission by "Jhony777" edit


"Jhony777" (talk) 14:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i already submit the link of charts then why you are not accepting my client article again im pasting the link here for you that you can see this artist songs are in charts in france http://www.chartsinfrance.net/Kingsheharyarmirza/albums-singles.html this is the link please tell me after watching this--"Jhony777" (talk) 14:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)-Jhoney777[reply]

Hi "Jhony777". Pure charts (chartinfrance.net) are not one of the charts Wikipedia accepts as reliable and authoritative. For France, the choices are: SNEP, Hung Medien, and InfoDisc. The draft has been rejected, meaning that volunteers do not intend to review it again. If, after six months or a year, more has been written about the subject in independent, reliable, secondary sources, you can try then to write another draft. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:48, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:20:12, 28 March 2021 review of submission by Tajulhq edit

Please review the article, I've corrected so many things. Tajulhq (talk) 15:20, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tajulhq: Who is "we"? If you ahve any affilation with the subject, pelase read over WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropiate disclosures for your situation. Victor Schmidt (talk) 15:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Victor Schmidt: Sorry, This is something I actually made a mistake in writing. There is no affiliation with the subject. I would love to learn Wikipedia.

15:27:38, 28 March 2021 review of draft by MichaelPackBrewGuy edit


I am requesting help because I don't know why my submission was declined. These are the reasons that I am confused. I used 10 sources which is more than a lot of the rivalry pages, so even if not all of them are reliable some of them should be good. I also saw that an article like Eagles-Washington only used 1 source. I am definitely not an expert on reliable sources, but the source that that article has does not appear to be more reliable then mine. The person that declined my page said that my article had not reliable sources, but I did include one source on all the games of the rivalry, one source on incredible moments, and many sources about game-logs that I thought were good for the rivalry. I don't know what other kinds of sources I would need to get this article submitted. Please take what I said into consideration, and if there still is a problem can you write me back.

MichaelPackBrewGuy (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MichaelPackBrewGuy You have sources citing games, but not sources that discuss a rivalry itself. Collecting some games together and calling it a rivalry is original research unless you have sources that call it a rivalry. Teams can play games together without a formal rivalry. 331dot (talk) 15:35, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

15:46:17, 28 March 2021 review of submission by Hanan Ali Kofiah edit

Why is my page declined? Hanan Ali Kofiah (talk) 15:46, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hanan Ali Kofiah, your draft does not have enough reliable sources to support the important informations given in it. Since this is a biography, it is also very important that the article must be well sourced. Please do find some reliable sources giving subject in-depth coverage and resubmit it again. All the best and regards. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 23:48, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:22:31, 28 March 2021 review of submission by MichaelPackBrewGuy edit

Are my new sources good now? I think I have 5 of my 13 sources that aren't about particular games, so I'm hoping that's what you're looking for.

MichaelPackBrewGuy (talk) 16:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

21:09:47, 28 March 2021 review of submission by MikeHejssjs edit


MikeHejssjs (talk) 21:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@MikeHejssjs please confirm that you have read the big, pink notice on your draft. It tells you in some detail why. Fiddle Faddle 22:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


21:26:18, 28 March 2021 review of submission by SamH1991 edit

To improve the article so it can go to submission SamH1991 (talk) 21:26, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SamH1991 Pease simply follow the review points made by the reviewer who pushed it back to you for further work. If you have questions please ask them first, then come here if you need even more information Fiddle Faddle 22:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:09:01, 28 March 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by HelperGirl0102 edit


Hello, I submitted an article for review and it was flagged first for one of the referenced I used. The notification I received said the reference was blacklisted, which I didn't understand. It was the full link to a magazine article with valid info on the subject of my article. I eventually removed the reference and was able to submit the article for review. Then the article was rejected and it seems like it was due to a lack of references. Can you help me understand what a blacklisted reference even means? It wasn't a compressed link or anything so I'm not sure what to do about that. Can you help me figure that out?

HelperGirl0102 (talk) 22:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HelperGirl0102 We blacklist certain sites for a plethora of irregularities. The main thing is no blacklisted site provided a useful reference. I suggest you ignore sites such as this and concentrate on finding the best real references you can. Please note that Wikipedia may never be used as a reference. Please use Wikilinks instead. See WP:CIRCULAR. That faux reference must be replaced.
Your draft was not rejected, but was declined and pushed back to you for further work Fiddle Faddle 22:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]