Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 July 16

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< July 15 << Jun | July | Aug >> July 17 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


July 16 edit

00:38:15, 16 July 2021 review of draft by Iamdoctah edit


Hello, I wrote an article on an orthopedic surgeon who was elected a National Academy of Medicine fellow out of three fellows last year. This is the draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Julieanne_P._Sees. Can you please explain how this is an advertisement? She is an AOA chair, one of three NAM fellows, and very famous in the osteopathic world. Please let me know how to write one properly. Iamdoctah (talk) 00:38, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

02:53:04, 16 July 2021 review of submission by 202.51.76.34 edit

Please let this article be discussed under Wikiproject Nepal to prove the notability. This would bring a clear image for your convenience. It won't be biased as well. This article is notable than hundreds of article published related to Nepal. You may not be familiar with Nepal related affairs. Some similar articles like Pradip Paudel, etc are available on wiki are also similar to as of Sharma and they are also not MP of any assembly and are just popular youth leader, similar age group as of Sharma. Lakhs of people follow Mr. Sharma at various platforms. Please note this and make an unbiased decision. 202.51.76.34 (talk) 02:53, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't get the right to pick-and-choose who reviews your draft, and nothing stops you from bringing the draft up to WT:WikiProject Nepal instead of here if you feel so strongly they should discuss it (though I imagine they'll tell you the same thing the reviewers have). Most of the sources I can assess are of no use, being name-drops or otherwise not really discussing him. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 03:18, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

05:49:30, 16 July 2021 review of submission by Fastwaq edit


Fastwaq (talk) 05:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fastwaq You didn’t ask a question but your draft was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. Eternal Shadow Talk 16:27, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:42:19, 16 July 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Moontaeils edit


I want to make sure my draft satisfies the Wikipedia criteria. Please help me paraphrase or rephrase my draft. Thank you.


Moontaeils (talk) 06:42, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Moontaeils: You aksed the same question at the Teahouse. Please only seek assistance in one place at a time, to prevent wasted efforts by reviwers and other folks watching this page. Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:43:23, 16 July 2021 review of submission by 188.96.230.225 edit

Mönkebüscher is a relevance person. As author he wrote more than 5 books ! --188.96.230.225 (talk) 13:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC) 188.96.230.225 (talk) 13:43, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. It appears this author does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable author, as shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Please see Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 13:44, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:50:13, 16 July 2021 review of submission by PawBow edit


PawBow (talk) 13:50, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have misspelled the name of the page I have created and I need support to make it right.

15:18:34, 16 July 2021 review of submission by TechnoBlogger14 edit


I've removed all the external links. Also, I have used all the valid sources, those sources are of India's reputed media channel.

TechnoBlogger14 (talk) 15:18, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TechnoBlogger14 The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further, as it appears this man does not meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. 331dot (talk) 16:14, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:33:22, 16 July 2021 review of submission by 2A02:C7F:609D:8200:844F:6692:60B1:C744 edit

Dear Sir,

I have used many sources and references when I created the new wiki page for Aartii Naagpal such as IMDb and her main personal website.

The two links are https://aartiinaagpal.com/ and https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1267507/ please view these links and check that i've provided lot of proof and also used many other references.

She is a Bollywood Film Actress based in Mumbai, India.


2A02:C7F:609D:8200:844F:6692:60B1:C744 (talk) 16:33, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both of those sources are not acceptable for establishing that this person meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable actress. IMDB is user-editable, and her personal website is a primary source. This is why the draft was rejected, and will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 16:52, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:57:01, 16 July 2021 review of submission by Ashokreddy edit

Hello, his is Telugu movie released in 1977, not many scanned/website articles to support such movies. I did outline the references, and there is a IMDB page for this movie too. This is a significant movie in Krishna Ghattamaneni's career. Please advise what else I should be doing. Ashokreddy (talk) 16:57, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We accept offline sources, if cited properly. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 17:48, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:17:37, 16 July 2021 review of draft by Socalvoyager1 edit


Hello. I understand the reasoning for this draft being declined, but I do not understand why this page has been declined when the Yale Literary Magazine wiki entry is much shorter and more poorly sourced than this one, and yet is its own independent page that has not been merged with Yale University. Or perhaps for consistency we should consider the same treatment for that page as well? Socalvoyager1 (talk) 23:17, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Socalvoyager1 Please see other stuff exists. We all can only address the articles or drafts in front of us. If you notice other inappropriate articles or content, feel free to point them out for possible action, or to work on such actions yourself. With over 6 million articles and only thousands of volunteers, we could use the help. 331dot (talk) 23:24, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2021_July_16&oldid=1034824012"