Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 January 18

Help desk
< January 17 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 19 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 18 edit

01:27:20, 18 January 2020 review of submission by 67.209.219.175 edit


67.209.219.175 (talk) 01:27, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

   Is there information available that gives instructions on repairs to Roman scutum made of leather after incurring damage from arrows?
  This page is for questions about the Articles for creation process. Please consider asking this question at the Wikipedia:Reference desk. They specialize in knowledge questions and will try to answer any question in the universe (except how to use Wikipedia, since that is what the Help Desk is for). Just follow the link, select the relevant section, and ask away. You could always try searching Wikipedia for an article related to the topic you want to know more about. I hope this helps.
--Worldbruce (talk) 01:31, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

08:05:05, 18 January 2020 review of submission by Itzneerv edit


Itzneerv (talk) 08:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has no sources, which means notability cannot be shown, it is also blatantly promotional "only Bangladeshi media production where media production is done with very skilled craftsmen". As such it cannot be accepted Nosebagbear (talk) 11:57, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:30:36, 18 January 2020 review of submission by Amuzujoe edit


Gabriel Joe Amuzu 11:30, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

12:32:20, 18 January 2020 review of submission by 2409:4063:4202:9DC9:0:0:FAD:88AC edit


2409:4063:4202:9DC9:0:0:FAD:88AC (talk) 12:32, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


14:24:19, 18 January 2020 review of submission by 2A02:C7D:5011:1400:ED53:9E99:11E0:CB6F edit


Changes have been made to this page which has added 12 citation references that verify this organisation and the work it is doing, along with the public figures who are part of this cause.

2A02:C7D:5011:1400:ED53:9E99:11E0:CB6F (talk) 14:24, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy hello! Various issues remain, and may be insurmountable. The sources do not show significant coverage of HUMEN, but rather the clause 14 initiative, which is not enough by its own. The main issue, is that it is a copyright violation, and will likely be deleted. Never copy and paste material into a page from another website. The tone of the draft was also quite promotional. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 20:08, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

15:55:43, 18 January 2020 review of draft by PatmanSA1 edit


Article rejected. But the information in the article is really factual based on press article very detailed which is downloaded on my wiki and that I can send to you. The trophy was created by Lord BLEDISLOE, the photo in the article is a press photo

regards patrick PatmanSA1 (talk) 15:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PatmanSA1, A single article is insufficient. You will need to find more sources. Also, I suspect the photo will be deleted as a copyright violation, as the photo is still under copyright. Images are held under copyright for 70 years after the photographer's death, and that date has not yet passed. CaptainEek Edits Ho Cap'n! 19:33, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20:12:01, 18 January 2020 review of submission by Jennagold2019 edit

I have redone this page to be more in line with Wiki standards. Please review and approve (I hope) Thanks, Jenna Jennagold2019 (talk) 20:12, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It still reads like blatant advertising to me? Theroadislong (talk) 21:45, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

22:21:53, 18 January 2020 review of submission by 216.174.71.7 edit


216.174.71.7 (talk) 22:21, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]