Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 December 1
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < November 30 | << Nov | December | Jan >> | December 2 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
December 1 edit
04:16:43, 1 December 2020 review of submission by Swickouski edit
- Swickouski (talk · contribs)
Hi. I am the author of an article which was submitted and recently declined. The reviewer noted that the article lacked proper citation and read lke an advertisement, However, I made a point of using internationally recognized third-party sources AND including detail about significant charges of insider trading. What do I need to do before resibmitting? Swickouski (talk) 04:16, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- Swickouski, I've replied to your message on my talk page, and on Hegvald's talk page too. It should answer your question. Kohlrabi Pickle (talk) 05:09, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
04:52:51, 1 December 2020 review of draft by Adityapawar1408 edit
Please tell me where you fill that our content looks like a marketing. Kinldy help me to publish this draft.
Adityapawar1408 (talk) 04:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
06:15:44, 1 December 2020 review of draft by AysarGha edit
It isn't clear to me what is not cited correctly. I felt the message left by Andrew was rather vague.
AysarGha (talk) 06:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
09:01:50, 1 December 2020 review of submission by Nikhilesh barua9 edit
Nikhilesh barua9 (talk) 09:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- Nikhilesh barua9 You don't ask a question, but Wikipedia is not a place for you to tell the world about yourself. Please read the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 09:12, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
15:56:14, 1 December 2020 review of draft by Sienawards edit
- Sienawards (talk · contribs)
Gina Williams (talk) 15:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Greetings, I submitted corrections to this page and haven't heard back for some time. I just want to make sure I'm doing everything correctly. I also asked for a revision to the name of the page, which should be: "Drone Photo Awards"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Drone_Awards
Thank you! --Gina Williams
16:42:17, 1 December 2020 review of submission by 2409:4071:E18:9CC5:941F:A521:8CE3:FBC3 edit
Dear Sir/Mam Please consider a relook into this article for publication consideration. Thank you in advance 2409:4071:E18:9CC5:941F:A521:8CE3:FBC3 (talk) 16:42, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- In order for a subject to have an article, you must demonstrate that the subject meets at least our General Notability Guideline, which says that Baikady would have to receive significant coverage (in-depth coverage, not passing mentions) from reliable secondary sources (no blogs, no random websites, but mainstream sources) that are independent of the subject. So where are the references that show that the media, (newspapers, magazines, books from major publishers, etc) are writing about Baikady and his work in depth? Because if the answer is "I can't find any", then the subject is likely not going to meet our notability standards. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
17:43:53, 1 December 2020 review of draft by SPP2012 edit
I have created my first AfC submission and clicked the box to "Submit the draft for review!" When I return to the draft page, it continues to read, "Draft article not currently submitted for review. This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review."
Is there anything else or additional I need to do to ensure my AfC submission is in queue for review?
SPP2012 (talk) 17:43, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- @SPP2012: Did you press the Publish Changes button that appears at the very bottom of the next page you see after you click the "Submit the draft for review" button? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
17:58:22, 1 December 2020 review of submission by KennyParis edit
- KennyParis (talk · contribs)
Hello, I believe my draft about the musicians/artists Picard Brothers is now ready to be approved but I still don't have any news and it's been 2 most since my last edit. I would really like to know if it's going to be declined again or if it can be approved please.
I have searched and found more reliable sources and I have taken other examples of producers who are less known than Picard Brothers and saw the sources they used and I have searched in the same places. I am following the rules of Wikipedia and I truly believe that they deserve their page to be approved please.
They have won a Grammy and they have produced the latest Beyoncé single, the last Mark Ronson album, and many songs for Diplo and Major Lazer. There are many websites mentioning their names, they participated in many of the biggest songs of the last decade.
KennyParis (talk) 17:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
19:08:17, 1 December 2020 review of submission by Hardik kachhawaha edit
Hardik kachhawaha (talk) 19:08, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- This was correctly rejected outright, nothing to suggest that you are notable enough for an article I'm afraid. Theroadislong (talk) 19:15, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
20:36:56, 1 December 2020 review of draft by Zifnab25 edit
I am currently revising Sima Ladjevardian's Wiki entry to expand its scope and establish her as a local political figure with significant press coverage. Prior to running for Congress, her philanthropic work and political activism has had a sizable impact on the Houston Area. And her close relationship with the Beto Senate and Presidential campaigns drove his success as a high profile fund raiser. The assorted links and notes should bare out both.
That said, I know standards for an article can be a bit subjective. So I'd like to know if the current updates are in line with Wiki standards for notability before I submit these article updates another time.
Zifnab25 (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
- It is not. We are not interested in a rerun of the Seigenthaler incident. Every claim the article makes MUST be cited to a strong secondary source or removed outright. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Takes a strong man to deny... 21:35, 1 December 2020 (UTC)