Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 September 10

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< September 9 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 11 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 10

edit

02:18:55, 10 September 2019 review of draft by Chamberednautilus

edit


Check neutral point of view and notability for draft article titled "Adam S. Weinberg". Chamberednautilus (talk) 02:18, 10 September 2019 (UTC) I am requesting an opinion about whether or not the current draft article for "Adam S. Weinberg" meets the Wikipedia standard for 'neutral point of view'. Also, I would appreciate confirmation if the subject of this draft article meets the Wikipedia standard for 'notability'. This draft article was first submitted for review on 9 May 2019. I've made changes to the text in response to a reviewer's comment to create a more neutral point of view. Are any further changes recommended? Thank-you, Chamberednautilus[reply]

Hi Chamberednautilus. The draft has been in the pool to be reviewed since 16 May. The backlog stands at 5 months, so you can anticipate a review, which will consider the issues you raised, around the middle of October. --Worldbruce (talk) 10:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

04:27:28, 10 September 2019 review of draft by Farzanfa007

edit 
please review Draft:Manjappada Kerala Blasters Fan Club  it's urgent please..

Farzan F A 04:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

The page reads like an advertisement. Will require fundamental rewrite. This community is driven by volunteers, nothing is "urgent". Please do not act entitled. Coderzombie (talk) 09:04, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:50:54, 10 September 2019 review of submission by 167.98.1.141

edit


167.98.1.141 (talk) 08:50, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:47:41, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre

edit

Hello,

There was a grammatical error in the sentence which we have rectified and replaced it with the old one.

Kindly review the same.

Regards, Chirag-Behre (talk) 09:47, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chirag-Behre. Rejection is intended to be final, to convey that the subject is not notable, so no amount of editing will make the draft acceptable here. You may wish to consider alternative outlets that have different inclusion criteria. --Worldbruce (talk) 10:05, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:26:20, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre

edit


Amit Ramani (born April 15, 1974) is an Indian entrepreneur who started Awfis Space Solutions (co-working spaces) in 2015 with 8 centers. Currently Awfis space solutions has centers in 8 cities across India with a total of 34 spaces. Amit Ramani is also the President and Managing Director of NELSON Asia, a leading group in Asia providing design and real estate consulting services.

Education

Amit Ramani graduated in B. Arch in the year 1994 from School of Planning & Architecture, New Delhi, India. He holds a Master’s degree in Architecture (Year 1999) from Kansas University, Manhattan Kansas. Additionally, he also holds a Master’s degree in Science (Year 2001) from Cornell University, Ithaca New York.

Career In the early years of his career, Amit worked as a Business partner with Bank of America. In April 2015, Amit Ramani established Awfis Space Solutions, with investment from The Three Sisters: Institutional Office, a family-run investment firm managed by Yes Bank founder Rana Kapoor’s daughters.

Chirag-Behre (talk) 10:26, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


10:30:38, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Chirag-Behre

edit


May I know why it has not been approved by the Wikipedia team? What are the further steps I need to take further. Chirag-Behre (talk) 10:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


12:35:36, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Ahmedpgp75

edit


Ahmedpgp75 (talk) 12:35, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahmedpgp75: - as the reviewer said, we aren't a CV-listing service. They gave some helpful links (in blue) which if you click to them will explain in more detail Nosebagbear (talk) 15:06, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:02:56, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Rbiddis1

edit


I'd like to be able to edit my wiki page and have it reviewed again. I have re-written the article to focus solely on Troublemaker (Band). I have also added several more references and items to show notability of the band. Please advise on how to move forward with my project. Thanks for your time and your help.

Rbiddis1 (talk) 13:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rbiddis1. Rejection is intended to be final, to convey that the topic (not just the current draft) is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing can fix that problem, so volunteers do not intend to review the draft again. If you have no conflict of interest with regard to the subject, then Articles for creation is an optional process for you, you may write directly at Troublemaker (band).
The reviewer's expert opinion is that if you do, the article will be deleted, and I concur. Sound Bites News, Houston Music News (which is a copy of Sound Bites News, so there's no point citing it), and Metal Maidens are primary source interviews where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, a type of source explicitly excluded from those that can demonstrate notabiliy. The Bash is a capsule history provided by the band. Like the interviews, it is not independent. CDbaby.com is a reliable source for the existence of a recording, but existence of a recording doesn't make a band notable. And Reverbnation is a marketing platform, not a reliable source. Novice editors are commonly advised to cite at least three indpendent, reliable, secondary sources that contain significant coverage of their topic. The draft cites no such sources. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:07, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:40:57, 10 September 2019 review of draft by Laura.vepraskas

edit


Hi! I believe it has been 8 weeks since my last submission. Is there anything my team can do to help move the review process forward. Happy to help in any way I can. Thanl you! Laura.vepraskas (talk) 13:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Laura.vepraskas#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:33, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Laura.vepraskas: Thank you for your declaration. Most businesses, including Syncfusion, are not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). You may find WP:BFAQ#COMPANY informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:06:23, 10 September 2019 review of draft by Parinthacker

edit


The page that I have requested for creation was rejected. I have since then made appropriate changes to bring it in line with Wikipedia policies and standards. The submission is pending for more than 2 months now. Can I please get some help in this matter?

Parinthacker (talk) 14:06, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Parinthacker. When you posted your question, you were presented with a large pink box that said, among other things: "If you are waiting for a reviewer to review your draft, please be patient, as drafts are reviewed in no specific order. The reviewing process currently has a 2+ months backlog, with 4,469 pending submissions waiting for review. Please do not ask for a reviewer to tell you the status of your draft or to review it faster." One part of that might be unclear. "2+ months" is currently "5 months". So you can anticipate a review around the first week of December. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:40, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:32:16, 10 September 2019 review of draft by 68.103.78.155

edit


68.103.78.155 (talk) 16:32, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We Will Have To Wait About Three Weeks For This Article So We Will Have To Find Out. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 16:32, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:35:12, 10 September 2019 review of draft by 68.103.78.155

edit


68.103.78.155 (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's A little Bit Too Soon But Hopefully it will be an article because the postseason Begins in About Three Weeks. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:59:00, 10 September 2019 review of submission by 41.215.173.71

edit


41.215.173.71 (talk) 18:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@41.215.173.71: - the draft didn't have any references and s otherwise doesn't appear notable (in the sense that there might be non-included reliable sources) Nosebagbear (talk) 20:27, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:15:21, 10 September 2019 review of submission by Ashley198299

edit


Ashley198299 (talk) 20:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G11ed for overt advertising Nosebagbear (talk) 20:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
To expand a little, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not free ad space. A company's "about us" page dripping in superlatives is not an encyclopedia article, even if copy-pasting it to Wikipedia wouldn't be a copyright violation. Huon (talk) 20:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2019_September_10&oldid=985270852"