Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 November 29
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< November 28 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 30 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 29
edit03:48:04, 29 November 2019 review of submission by Geoffkors
editThis man created perhaps the most infamous Minecraft-themed song of all time with "Mine Diamonds" that has over 32 million views and many high-profile YouTubers have featured it. If many random articles of random people that 99.9% of people haven't heard of outside some village in Hungary are here, surely HAYDEN MCNULTY should have a small article about him. Geoffkors (talk) 03:48, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
06:38:18, 29 November 2019 review of draft by JasBha
edit
Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia. I'd submitted a draft (HappyShappy.com) that got declined. I've made the changes subsequently. My problem is I'm unable to resubmit the improved draft. Tried 2 to 3 times, added the captcha and headline. Don't know what I'm doing wrong.
JasBha (talk) 06:38, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
08:00:22, 29 November 2019 review of draft by 116.75.74.109
edit
116.75.74.109 (talk) 08:00, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
08:40:24, 29 November 2019 review of submission by Wp inds
edit
Wp inds (talk) 08:40, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- Wp inds, The draft has been deleted, we cannot help you. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:39, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
08:47:10, 29 November 2019 review of submission by Solomon Anthony
editHello, I have been drafting this short biography for some time now and the recent review stated that there was an insignificant amount of secondary source coverage. I have since added more references to the page and edited its content around them, but my concerns are that many of the secondary sources are Youtube videos encompassing the original published works, which were generally reliable news broadcasts. A few of the broadcasts are from over 20 years ago. Some have since been uploaded by the agency and others by an individual journalist.
I have read Wikipedia:Videos_as_references. My question after reading videos as references is how I would go about acquiring the data since some broadcasts are unavailable on the internet and exactly what I would need so I can be sure those sources are certified before I resubmit for review?
-Thank You Solomon Anthony (talk) 08:47, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
12:13:01, 29 November 2019 review of submission by Abhis1994
edit
I am willing to get advise, how this article is not deleted.
Abhis1994 (talk) 12:13, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- Abhis1994, What was the subject of the article? Please reply on my talk page, not here. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:33, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
12:15:52, 29 November 2019 review of submission by Noreen Ly
edit
Noreen Ly (talk) 12:15, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- Noreen Ly, None of those references are acceptable. What you need is reliable and independent coverage in newspapers, books, or media outlets. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:32, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
What references are acceptable? Do you think I should delete the references instead? Thank you {{subst:usigned}}
- Just as Captain Eek said above: "reliable and independent coverage in newspapers, books, or media outlets". WP:GNG explains the minimum requirements for references for a draft to be accepted. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 23:03, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
12:48:45, 29 November 2019 review of submission by NoelleKabel
edit- NoelleKabel (talk · contribs)
I am requesting a re-review, because I added proved notability to the topic. I included several more references to show that Master Mindo Damalis is a notable topic.
NoelleKabel (talk) 12:48, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- NoelleKabel, Sorry, this subject is not notable enough for inclusion. Please focus on another area of Wikipedia to edit. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:29, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
16:36:44, 29 November 2019 review of submission by 213.207.238.42
edit
213.207.238.42 (talk) 16:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- I'm afraid your topic is simply not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia yet. Theroadislong (talk) 18:50, 29 November 2019 (UTC)