Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 May 16

Help desk
< May 15 << Apr | May | Jun >> May 17 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


May 16

edit

00:54:18, 16 May 2019 review of submission by Nickyjamyelcangri787

edit


Nickyjamyelcangri787 (talk) 00:54, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Filer was indeffed for socking. Nothing to do here anymore. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 18:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:38:09, 16 May 2019 review of draft by أبو السعد 22

edit


أبو السعد 22 (talk) 08:38, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you accepting non-english sources?

أبو السعد 2 Greetings. Sources in any languages are accepted. Pls note only independent, reliable sources would contribute to the notability requirement. Sources such as from major newspaper are good sources. Pop back here if you need further assistance. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:31, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:50:51, 16 May 2019 review of draft by Drbadloti

edit


Drbadloti (talk) 08:50, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:22:46, 16 May 2019 review of draft by Mlawsn

edit


Hello, I recently created the artical The Republc of Volpat, I just wanted to tell you that I am the creaator of the micronation and that most of the data came from me! Thank You!

Mlawsn (talk) 11:22, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mlawsn. Wikipedia articles must be based on information published in reliable sources, not on the personal knowledge of its editors. See verifiability. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:48, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:25:16, 16 May 2019 review of submission by Gihongamerbr

edit


CAN U PLEASE HELP ME MAKE A ARTICLE Gihongamerbr (talk) 11:25, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


13:26:32, 16 May 2019 review of submission by Louisgm

edit


What changes would you advise making? This article is not intended as "advertisement", simply an interesting record for an individual already referenced on two Wikipedia pages ('Greatest Britons' & 'Claire Goose'). Louisgm (talk) 13:26, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Louisgm. Many people are mentioned somewhere in Wikipedia, but are not suitable subjects for stand alone encyclopedia articles, so that's not a good reason to create this draft. I advise moving on to a different topic (we have nearly 6 million to choose from). If you pursue this one, look for more sources like the Evening Standard article, ones that go into some depth about Goose with a minimum of him talking about himself. Try scholarly books, academic journals, The Times, The Financial Times, the BBC, The New York Times, and the like. Better sources can sometimes help remedy tone problems, although your own writing experience - academic, journalistic, public relations, etc. - also plays a role. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:43, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:26:47, 16 May 2019 review of submission by TobiasStage

edit


TobiasStage (talk) 16:26, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, how do you make text blue where people can click it and go to another Wikipedia site of that? Fx. If i put Los Angeles, how can i make the text a link where people can click it and go to a Wikipedia page about Los Angeles?


TobiasStage Good day. This is call lingking. Place double brackets on the left and the right sides of "Los Angeles" - see here in source editing move Los Angeles. Check out how to wikify here - Help:Wikitext. You can ask any questing regarding "editing" at WP:Teahouse if you need help. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 17:42, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:20:38, 16 May 2019 review of submission by Yangkou

edit


He is a noble person in society!A Highly regarded among is Hmong people also American society, worthy to be documented into history.

Yangkou (talk) 17:20, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yangkou. The draft fails to demonstrate that he is notable (suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). --Worldbruce (talk) 18:05, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yangkou: If you are the subject in question, please review WP:AUTOBIO. JTP (talkcontribs) 20:00, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:30:41, 16 May 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Mlawsn

edit


Why was my new micronation artical declined?


Mlawsn (talk) 18:30, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mlawsn: It needs significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Micronations can easily be WP:MADEUP; simply existing does not prove notability. JTP (talkcontribs) 19:56, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:08:48, 16 May 2019 review of submission by Mlawsn

edit


Because I have land for this new Micronation, why do other micronation have pages and I can't? Here is other micros for example! http://www.molossia.org/ Mlawsn (talk) 21:08, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:12:52, 16 May 2019 review of submission by Mlawsn

edit


What can I do to get this artical published? I'll do anything! Mlawsn (talk) 22:12, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


23:00:54, 16 May 2019 review of submission by Paul.jonah.paul

edit


I made another attempt at editing this page, removing what might be considered buzzwords. I'd appreciate it if this can be reviewed again and considered. I disagree with the notability reasoning for rejecting the page, as they are well-known in their industry and many similar companies have pages on Wikipedia.

Paul.jonah.paul (talk) 23:00, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul.jonah.paul. The draft treats Shift4 Payments as if it's an extension of Harbortouch. Wikipedia favors large, comprehensive articles, which suggests it would be best to cover Shift4 Payments and Harbortouch in a single article, much as the British Oliver Typewriter Company is covered within Oliver Typewriter Company. In that case Draft:Shift4 Payments should be abandoned, and changes should be made (or, if you have a conflict of interest, proposed) to Harbortouch. For more advice on the best way to handle parents, subsidiaries, shells, holding companies, etc., reach out to Wikipedia:WikiProject Companies. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:49, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]