Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 June 5

Help desk
< June 4 << May | June | Jul >> June 6 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 5

edit

00:39:19, 5 June 2019 review of submission by Chatzos

edit


Chatzos (talk) 00:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

trying to post an article about the formation, mission and locations of an existing Jewish organization. The name is Chatzos, or Kollel Chatzos

We are not familiar with how to post on Wikipedia and how to place sources in the article, and it's rejecting us for that reason. It's quite confusing the process.

Any help would be appreciated.

Chatzos Greetings. Your article - User:Chatzos/sandbox - was rejected there are no sources to supported the content claimed. Pls note for a page to be merit a page in Wikipedia main space (1) the subject needs to be notable. (2) the content need to have multiple coverage by (3) independent, (4) reliable sources, whereby the sources (6) talk about the subject in length and in dept. (7) the content needs to be free of copyright infringement (write in your own words and (8) free of WP:PROMOTION. Lastly, the article needs to write in neutral point of view. Pls read the comment on made by the review of proper attribution on the article and also the comment on the grey panel. Pls read WP:Your First Article and WP:GOLDENRULE to understand what are needed to write an article besides what comment given above and referencing for inline citation. I could suggest you to change you username as it is the same as the subject (an organisation) which conflict with Wikipedia WP:Username policy. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:54, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:14:17, 5 June 2019 review of submission by JunoSanghera

edit

Hello, I want to understand the reason behind deleting my article on Priyadarshi Ranjan JunoSanghera (talk) 08:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

JunoSanghera Good day. You draft article content violated copyright infringement - see HERE. You need to write the article in your own words and not copy and paste the content from other articles. Wikipedia takes copyright infringement violation very seriously as it entails legal implication. Pls also read WP:Your First Article and WP:GOLDENRULE to understand how to write an article in Wikipedia. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
CASSIOPEIA I thank you for your tip and help on my article. I will frame the article in my own words. Appreciate it.--JunoSanghera (talk) 11:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
JunoSanghera Welcome. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:02:57, 5 June 2019 review of submission by 183.82.2.194

edit


183.82.2.194 (talk) 11:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC) 11:02:57, 5 June 2019 review of submission by 183.82.2.194[reply]

I have a dream to invent a new instrument for formers.many of farmers are effecting of snake bites.by using this instrumrnt we can avoid snakes.

  At a certain range snakes get irretation.This range have to incert in a stick.By this ve can avoiun snakes near by me.this stick contains of 4 feets.It was an chargable device.it consists of let torch and this device.its an ieon stick with a grip which was easy to carry.

15:21:08, 5 June 2019 review of draft by 68.103.78.155

edit


I Created The 2019-20 Dallas Mavericks season article last week. And it is currently in draft space. but when will this become a article. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 15:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

68.103.78.155 (talk) 15:21, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please be patient. There are currently 4010 submissions awaiting review, so it can take over three months. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 06:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What No 2019-20 Dallas Mavericks article. 68.103.78.155 (talk) 15:04, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:44:40, 5 June 2019 review of submission by E-Stylus

edit

Is it within WP:COI guidelines for an editor with a COI to move a draft into main space after addressing the decline reason submitted by the reviewing editor? I worked on improving the tone of the above draft, however the content refers to independent, reliable, published sources to meet verifiability guidelines and establish notability. I asked for a re-review from the reviewing editor and the AfC help desk, but received no response. Thanks. E-Stylus (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC) E-Stylus (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi E-Stylus. No. A paid editor is very strongly discouraged from moving their drafts to article space. It should be left up to a reviewer who does not have a conflict of interest to evaluate whether previously identified problems have been adequately addressed, and assess whether there are other problems. Drafts are often reviewed by a different reviewer each time they are submitted. Resubmitting the draft for review is the correct way to get it examined. Neither reviewers of earlier versions nor this help desk are shortcuts around the AfC reviewing process, which currently has a 15-week backlog. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:48, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the info Worldbruce. E-Stylus (talk) 16:54, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Worldbruce - I was unaware that the "very strongly discouraged" verbiage meant "prohibited". If this is the guideline, I will comply going forward. The draft's declining editor, Theroadislong has moved the article back to draft space. The draft was submitted 3/14/19, declined 5/29/19 and re-submitted from 5/30/19 to 6/7/19. If an additional period of up to 15 weeks is the only option for a re-review, I will wait. Thanks. E-Stylus (talk) 18:36, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:36:42, 5 June 2019 review of draft by Nateperreault

edit


Hello, I would just like to know if there is anything else (excluding the addition of references) that I could add to help get the page published. There are 3 other pages for teams (Essa Stallions, Grey Highlans Hawks, and Seaforth Generals) in the CPJHL and I believe the Muskoka Anglers pages is not drastically different.

Nateperreault (talk) 17:36, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nateperreault. References are key to demonstrating notability (suitability for inclusion). The existence of an article does not mean it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or that it is welcome. It may only mean that no one has gotten around to deleting it yet. It is not a good excuse to create similar articles. The essay WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS may help you understand why. If you wish to learn from example articles, be sure to use only Wikipedia's best. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:03, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:50:55, 5 June 2019 review of draft by Harvey Logins2

edit


Harvey Logins2 (talk) 18:50, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Review Article

23:11:41, 5 June 2019 review of draft by Mandii.c

edit


Hi, I created a draft at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Cremation_in_Japan, but I decided to work on the article in my sandbox. The article in my sandbox was declined because the draft page of the same name exists. Could you please advise me on how to delete the draft I created at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Cremation_in_Japan? Thanks for your time. Mandii.c (talk) 23:11, 5 June 2019 (UTC) Mandii.c (talk) 23:11, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]