Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 January 4

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< January 3 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 5 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 4

edit

00:05:16, 4 January 2019 review of submission by Bethcarey

edit


I want to know if my new revised References are ok. Feedback on my first submission said I required reliable, secondary references, which I've now added. I believe I should get this reviewed first, before 're-submitting', if I am correct. thankyouBethcarey (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bethcarey (talk) 00:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bethcarey, Good day and welcome to AfC help desk. I believe you are were referring to Draft:Dagmar Evelyn Cyrulla. Comments see below.
  1. remove all the external links in the body text (example - Wagner Contemporary Gallery and etc)
  2. remove/delete Representation section
  3. remove/delete Artist Residencies & Grants section
  4. remove all unimportant solo, group exhibition and prize/competitions and except leave those are significant ones - provide sources please
  5. remove all External links except one subject official web site - see WP:ELMIN
  6. pls provide sources to support "Early life and education" section, if cant, pls remove the section.
  7. subject is notable with the sources provided at present, when all the above have been done, pls let me know on to my talk page and I will review for you.

Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:49, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

00:46:30, 4 January 2019 review of submission by 81.104.142.198

edit


The US aristocrats has a page of their own: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%26P_500_Dividend_Aristocrats

Why should the European aristocrats not have a page of their own?

What changes can I make to the article for it to be published? I've added a reference. I can add more. I've cross reference to and from other Wikipedia articles. 81.104.142.198 (talk) 00:46, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:21:45, 4 January 2019 review of submission by SeattleWriter2019

edit

Hi, my draft was rejected because of a lack of citations. I added them and I was wondering if these are adequate. Thank you!

SeattleWriter2019 (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See DGG's comment. Your draft has to be rewritten in a neutral tone. More information left on your talk page. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 05:31, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:56:29, 4 January 2019 review of submission by Elgatoboo

edit


Vive Studios is under the HTC Vive umbrella; however, its filmography is notable enough to be listed, in similar fashion to how competitor Occulus Story Studio has an independent article listing its filmography from its parent company's page, Occulus. Moreover, Vive Studios' filmography is expected to continue publishing new titles; whereas, Occulus Story Studio has ceased operations.[1]

Additionally, a reviewer suggested there may be a conflict of interest; however, I have no personal or professional connection to the company. I'm just an avid VR news follower and am not sure how to prove otherwise. Please advise. Elgatoboo (talk) 05:56, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ https://variety.com/2017/digital/news/oculus-story-studio-shutting-down-1202409809/

06:30:57, 4 January 2019 review of draft by Joshuanigeria

edit


My article keeps getting rejected even though the person is very popular in my country. The web respects American popularity, it should also respect that of Lebanese too. Joshuanigeria (talk) 06:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:34:05, 4 January 2019 review of submission by Joshuanigeria

edit

People want to know about the person stated above from Lebanon. After all what he did. But since there are poor references about him, the article doesn't go through. Joshuanigeria (talk) 06:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:37:41, 4 January 2019 review of submission by 182.73.208.249

edit


182.73.208.249 (talk) 07:37, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Yogi Shihan Selvakumar. A Yoga and Karate Master in Trivandrum, kerala State. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yogi shihan selvakumar (talk • contribs) 08:46, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:58:55, 4 January 2019 review of submission by Yogi shihan selvakumar

edit


Yogi shihan selvakumar (talk) 08:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


09:12:59, 4 January 2019 review of submission by Bandrewb444

edit


Bandrewb444 (talk) 09:12, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


11:12:07, 4 January 2019 review of submission by Yogi shihan selvakumar

edit


Yogi shihan selvakumar (talk) 11:12, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


11:44:47, 4 January 2019 review of submission by Yogi shihan selvakumar

edit


Yogi shihan selvakumar (talk) 11:44, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


11:49:10, 4 January 2019 review of submission by Wikiwel

edit


STOP sign rejection looks total! Is this advice to completely abandon Tris Penna article..? Wikiwel (talk) 11:49, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


13:02:00, 4 January 2019 review of submission by Klafkowski

edit

Hi hope you're well,

I understand that some parts of my article do read like an advert, but I'm just hoping to narrow down if there are any parts in particular, or, if it's the entire thing, that I need to rewrite?


Many thanks


Klafkowski (talk) 13:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:38:44, 4 January 2019 review of submission by Arash142

edit


Arash142 (talk) 15:38, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


15:47:37, 4 January 2019 review of draft by 62.232.255.249

edit


62.232.255.249 (talk) 15:47, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I entered the text for this page (ISO 11064) in November and clicked to get it published but it's still in draft. How can I get it reviewed and published please? Thanks, Tina.

17:45:40, 4 January 2019 review of submission by Schmied15

edit


Schmied15 (talk) 17:45, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I want to make sure that I have all of the proper information here...

1. I was denied because of lack of "reliable sources". I am not sure which specific area you are referring to? (I have since added some links and a second source apart from the SPTOR website).

2. This is still a work in progress, and I have plans to go through and upload the theme, photo, and rendering for every year that I have it, but don't want to waste the time doing that until I know that we are OK to proceed. (The first 3 years are completed as an example for what I want to do everywhere.)

3. I have made edits to the Cal Poly Rose Float page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cal_Poly_Universities_Rose_Float) many times, and am trying to mimic that page for the South Pasadena page. If there is a specific area of the page that is requiring edits or additional sources, please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schmied15 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Schmied15 Good day and welcome to article for creation help desk. I believe you were referring to Draft:South Pasadena Tournament of Roses Association . Pls take your time to read the below for the answers of your question above and re-read it if you needed as there are a lot of info provided. Please click on the "blue high lighted text" for details information. Also pls read WP:Your First Article on how to write an article in Wikipedia.


Subject needs to meet notability requirements with significant in dept coverage (at least 3) of independent, reliable  sources that would be verified where by the sources  talk about the subject in length and in depth  to merit a page in Wikipedia mainspace.
Topic Explanation Examples/Info
Reliable source A reliable source is a source that  provides a thorough, well-reasoned theory, argument, discussion and based on strong evidence, high-quality  with with fact-checking and accuracy  that has been published in reputable, well-regarded academic/mainstream  presses.
Independent source Independent source means the content is not written by subject, anyone is affiliated with the subject or paid by the subject and the sourced content is not derived from the subject's website and not a press release.
  • official website
  • press release
  • not written by subject, paid by the subject or affiliated with the subject
Verifiability Reader able to check the content is not made up where by reliable cited source in the article is attributed and could be verified.
  • All content must be verifiable and the burden to demonstrate such verifiability lies with the editor who added/changed the content.


Type Explanation Examples
Primary A primary source provides direct or  first hand evidence/knowledge about an event, work of art and  account from people who are directly involved in a situation or a material  written by such persons.
  • scientific journal articles reporting experimental research results
  • proceedings of meetings, conferences and symposia, speeches, oral histories
  • diaries, autobiographies, letters, Internet communications on email
  • government documents, original documents (such as birth certificate or trial transcripts) , census statistics, legal documents
  • eyewitness accounts, results of experiments, statistical data
  • archives and manuscript material, historic treaties
  • interviews, surveys, fieldwork, map, testimonies, case notes
  • original works art, photographs, audio recordings, video recordings, films
  • memo, diaries, autobiographies, personal narratives, plays, poems
  • data sets, technical reports, patent, surveys and polls
  • raw data sets,experimental research results, the periodic table
Secondary A secondary source gives information about primary source or original information or other secondary resources , which analyse, describe, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize of the facts, evidence, concepts, and ideas taken from primary sources.
  • biographical works, histories studies  (may also be tertiary)
  • newspaper and popular magazine articles (may also be primary such as interview pieces and etc.)
  • Textbooks,  dictionaries and encyclopaedias (may also be tertiary)
  • review articles and literature reviews,  works of criticism, interpretation, commentaries
  • analyses journal articles and research papers based on primary sources
Tertiary Tertiary sources provide overviews  that index, abstract, compile or digest the primary and secondary sources. It presents the summaries content primary and /or secondary sources.
  • almanacs, fact books, chronologies, guidebooks, manuals
  • dictionaries and encyclopaedias
  • handbooks and data compilations
  • note: Wikipedia can NOT be the source.  Pls see WP:NOTRS - "Wikipedia employs no systematic mechanism for fact checking or accuracy. Thus, Wikipedia articles (and Wikipedia mirrors) in themselves are not reliable sources for any purpose (except as sources on themselves per WP:SELFSOURCE)".


Subject Primary Secondary Tertiary
Art Sculpture Article critiquing the culture Encyclopaedic article on the sculptor
History Diary of a prisoner of Iraq war Book on the Iraq war List of battles sites
Science Original research on nano technology Review of the research nano technology Nano technology abstracts
If anything is unclear above, please read Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:49, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21:44:54, 4 January 2019 review of submission by KKacir

edit

While I understand that COI editing is discouraged, I believe that the person in question meets Wikipedia's notability standards. I would greatly appreciate it if an editor could indicate which specific statements violate Wikipedia's neutrality policy. KKacir (talk) 21:44, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned almost a month ago about disclosure of paid editing, but have failed to follow our instructions. --Orange Mike | Talk 23:04, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'd add the subject while he appears to be a compontent professional he is not necessarily notable. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 23:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:39:55, 4 January 2019 review of draft by Rlittlesii

edit


Rlittlesii (talk) 22:39, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I want to add references to a page I am trying to submit. When I click the edit icon by references the only thing I see under references is

. How do I interact with reflist to add more references to it?!

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2019_January_4&oldid=877672849"