Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 December 31

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< December 30 << Nov | December | Jan >> January 1 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 31 edit

04:46:10, 31 December 2019 review of submission by Fenojoy edit

Fenojoy (talk) 04:46, 31 December 2019 (UTC) I tried to publish an article about a hospital at Kochi, which is established in 1952 (Was started even before 1946). But the content was not published. It may be because my unawareness in posting. Kindly help me to resolve the issue and please post the Hospital information in the page, as it is one of the first charitable mission hospital in Kochi, Kerala.[reply]

Fenojoy, Perhaps you refer to User:Fenojoy/sandbox/MAJ Hospital? Or User:Fenojoy/sandbox? In either case, you need to greatly expand both articles using reliable sources (see referencing for beginners). But what you really should do is start new articles using the Article Wizard, as the Wizard automatically formats a new article for you. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:52, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:21:12, 31 December 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Rahul1436 edit


I am new for creating wiki pages. I am trying to create wiki page for Manjusha. She is host for many celebrity shows. Manjusha is inspirational figure and i want to know people know the same . I don't know the reason why my article got rejected. Initially i thought because of reference so i edited it and added her verified social media account. Still it got rejected. Can you help me creating this page. It's really helpful to me. Rahul1436 (talk) 05:21, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahul1436: References need to be Independent, so her social media account(s) arent considered a Reliable source. Happy new Year, Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:33:57, 31 December 2019 review of submission by Furious Cadets edit


Furious Cadets (talk) 09:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Furious Cadets, Wikipedia is not for creating an autobiography. We only write about folks who have been covered in reliable sources. Your own YouTube videos are not suffucient. You need news coverage. Your page is against our guidelines, and will be deleted. That feels bad, but you should take this as a learning opportunity. I invite you to take The Wikipedia Adventure to show you the basics of Wikipedia. Or if you have other questions, please ask them at the friendly Teahouse. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:55, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


10:04:14, 31 December 2019 review of submission by Ksameer22 edit

Hi,

This is about rejection of draft glByte, Could you please help/suggest me to improve the draft. This company is founded in mid year of 2019 and doesn't have any article, blog or news for notability.
I have gone through notability guide lines and still confused. How can I improve this draft ?

Any help is appreciated

Thanks
Ksameer22 (talk) 10:04, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ksameer22. Wikipedia is not a business directory. Its articles cover notable topics—those that have gained significant attention by the world at large and over a period of time. If there isn't significant coverage of the company in independent reliable sources, then there is nothing you can do to improve the draft because the topic doesn't belong in the encyclopedia. Most businesses aren't notable. You may find WP:BFAQ#Company informative. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:38, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:12:54, 31 December 2019 review of submission by Vesta82601 edit


Trying to cover as part of civic engagement work, can we delete offending sections? Everything after career?

Vesta82601 (talk) 15:12, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vesta82601: who is "we"? Wikipedia accounts must not be shared. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:40, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Victor Schmidt: We meaning me and the reviewer.

@Vesta82601: Not sure why the reviewer would delete the offending sections, they didn't even specify any sections. But in general: this article has several problems, which I do not believe are surmountable. The sources do not give significant coverage to the subject, which means that they do not show how he is notable. The article seems to exist to promote the subject to notability, instead of reporting on an already notable subject. And the tone and style of writing is inadequate. If you can find me 3 sources that talk about Putorti with significant coverage and are reliable and independent, he might then be notable. But of the existing sources, none appear to mention him in more than passing. Oh, and PS: please make sure to sign all posts on talk page with four tildes "~". Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:32, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:14:02, 31 December 2019 review of submission by 2401:4900:40B6:6D64:0:6A:8706:FD01 edit


Dear how to create this Articles. Mention its 2401:4900:40B6:6D64:0:6A:8706:FD01 (talk) 19:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article will not be created. Stop trying. The community determined, at Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Draft:Rahul_Megh_Arya_Page, that the subject is not notable. That means it should not be on Wikipedia. Please stop creating this article, as you are being disruptive. It will continue to be removed and deleted. Give it a few years, and maybe then the subject will be notable. But at this time, they are not. In the meantime, please find something constructive to work on here. You may wish to take the Wikipedia Adventure to show you around. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:00, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User:Captain Eek is right. Unregistered editors have been trying to game the system in order to get a listing of this non-notable person. If the disruption continues, the title will be salted, and the IPv6 addresses may be blocked temporarily. (I recommended salting the title two months ago.) Robert McClenon (talk) 16:16, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

19:48:38, 31 December 2019 review of submission by Escrenock edit

Could someone provide more feedback on how citations need to be changed? John is notable in his field, has previously won a prestigious fellowship at Oxford, and his colleagues have qualified for pages. Thanks for your help! Escrenock (talk) 19:48, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Escrenock, You can't just cite someone's papers. You need sources that discuss the subject as a person. You also need to show how they meet some part of the academic notability guidelines. If they do not meet some part of the guidelines, or do not have enough sources that discuss them, they are not notable. Also, every statement in the article needs an inline citation. Furthermore, the article seems to be more about the CEHB than John. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
User:Escrenock - Also, are you related to the subject? If so, please read the conflict of interest policy and make the disclosure. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2019_December_31&oldid=985268875"