Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 December 21
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < December 20 | << Nov | December | Jan >> | December 22 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
December 21 edit
- Arizonista (talk · contribs)
I would like to know why my very simple edit. I changed the line "Police found no evidence..." to Police SAID THEY found no evidence..." which of course is more careful and less declarative. This is elementary journalism. Please explain.
Arizonista (talk) 02:43, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Arizonista, Howdy hello! This isn't the standard place to ask those sorts of questions, you should ask at the Teahouse in the future. But since you're here, I'll say: you made that edit 3+ years ago. Kind of late to ask that question. The reason your edit was undone has been lost to time. In fact, its possible that the phrasing was just changed in general. Articles change a lot in the course of years. If you want to make the change again, you ought ask on the talk page of the article in question. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 03:28, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Dinesh Gautam 1 (talk) 05:51, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Dinesh Gautam 1, Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself or people you know. It is also not for writing about minor news events. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 06:17, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
09:51:56, 21 December 2019 review of submission by 42.110.142.141 edit
This subject is notable, Kumar Sen is a very rich business man. Requesting a re-review.
42.110.142.141 (talk) 09:51, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
09:53:12, 21 December 2019 review of submission by 42.110.142.141 edit
The subject is notable. He is a brilliant maths teacher, requesting a re-review
17:38:52, 21 December 2019 review of submission by Wkpobox edit
Wkpobox (talk) 17:38, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Please re-review, additional changes have been made.
Thanks
- Hi Wkpobox. The references are so incomplete that they are unverifiable. Content on discogs.com is user-generated, so that website is not a reliable source. The AllMusic url is a dead link. There is a relevant page on AllMusic, https://www.allmusic.com/artist/ira-ingber-mn0000098637/credits, but it doesn't support the claims about The Knight Before Christmas or Outlander. I suggest you spend some time studying Help:Referencing for beginners and Wikipedia's best articles about musicians. Then build up experience by editing existing articles for a while. After that, if you still want to create a new article, choose a topic with which you do not have a conflict of interest.
- Rejection is meant to be final, to convey that the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing can fix that problem. There is no option to re-submit the draft because volunteers do not intend to review it again. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:32, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
17:51:23, 21 December 2019 review of submission by AnuYog edit
I have made all the changes according to reviewer's suggestions & comments. Kindly have a look & approve this page.AnuYog (talk) 17:51, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
AnuYog (talk) 17:51, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hi AnuYog. The draft is in the pool to be reviewed. With the current backlog, you can anticipate that will happen in the next 4-5 months. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
18:00:48, 21 December 2019 review of submission by Dr.Farrukh Khan edit
- Dr.Farrukh Khan (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Dr.Farrukh Khan (talk) 18:00, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Why you have rejected my appeal?.If there is a mistake I kindly say can you please correct the wrong stuff and upload it please.
- Hi Dr.Farrukh Khan. Rejection is meant to be final, to convey that the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing can fix that problem. There is no option to re-submit the draft because volunteers do not intend to review it again. --Worldbruce (talk) 18:40, 21 December 2019 (UTC)