Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 December 19

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< December 18 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 20 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 19

edit

04:32:53, 19 December 2017 review of submission by 31.48.108.182

edit


31.48.108.182 (talk) 04:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

04:51:11, 19 December 2017 review of submission by Rubz22

edit


Hi, this is my first article I posted. It’s very short and about a term coined in recent psychotherapy called “expansion”.

In hindsight I see that there’s a sentence or two describing this process. Could this be why it failed? Or is it something else I need to learn about?

Thanks in advance.

Rubz22 (talk) 04:51, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rubz22. As explained in the boxes at the top of your draft, it was declined because you have not shown that the concept is notable. You need to add references to reliable sources that define and discuss it. If the term is a recent coining, it may be that it is not yet notable enough for inclusion. – Joe (talk) 10:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17:49:43, 19 December 2017 review of submission by 47.55.28.127

edit


for a long time ive been trying argue against the weasel talk from the acronyms that try to control my finances.. life .. etc existance( feeling) ... even to the the argument that its a tarnishment in the good family name of adams .after this accident my head dont work but my perception of philosophy has.. however i alone feel helpless n hopliess to this plight .. if any help can expose their lies and heal my family and myself . please please please help 47.55.28.127 (talk) 17:49, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17:54:12, 19 December 2017 review of submission by Ktonmedia

edit

Hello, this article was declined due to lack of strong reference. I was wondering why the reference page was not sufficient and what would need to be done to resubmit. Thanks for the help. Ktonmedia (talk) 17:54, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ktonmedia. Please read the useful advice the reviewer has given you and the guidelines they have linked to. We need to see that the subject of your article has been written about in multiple, independent reliable sources. You have only a single reference in your draft. – Joe (talk) 10:12, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:14:56, 19 December 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by GermanGamer77

edit


What if I am creating an article on my own group of editors, and there ARE no sources? GermanGamer77 21:14, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GermanGamer77, then it doesn't belong in the encyclopedia. JTP (talk • contribs) 22:16, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I would like you to know something. WP:SO AND SO has no sources and IT belongs, so mine does too.
Not meant in a harsh way, GermanGamer77 18:39, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@GermanGamer77:, if you mean Wikipedia:SO, it is not an article. Any existing article that without a source but notable, may survived from deletion, but would be tagged for {{unsourced}}. While your draft is unsourced and non-notable. Matthew_hk tc 18:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

22:02:26, 19 December 2017 review of submission by KJP1

edit

Hi, was drawn here by the request for reviewers on the Architecture portal. Thought I might be able to help out, as I've written a few architecture articles and done a few GARs. Came across the draft for Elmstone Church which, in my view, is certainly acceptable. But I can't see how to start the review! I'm generally a bit of an idiot when it comes to things technical on Wiki, but where's the button (or equivalent) to begin the review? With GAR, you have a Start Review button on the article's Talkpage but I can't see the equivalent. KJP1 (talk) 22:02, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, KJP1, and thank you for deciding to join us! The first step is to enable Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be done by going to your Preferences, clicking on Gadgets, and checking Yet Another AFC Helper Script. WP:AFC/RI is where you can find all of the reviewing instructions. A draft can be reviewed by hovering over "More" at the top of the page, and clicking "Review (AFCH)". Happy reviewing! Welcome to AFC! JTP (talk • contribs) 22:21, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ah! - that's where the button is. Many thanks and I shall now make my first attempt. Best regards. KJP1 (talk) 22:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So, I've now done my first one. It appears to have worked, and I've dropped a congratulatory note on the editor's Talkpage and left some suggestions for improvement on the article Talkpage. It would be very helpful if someone could have a quick look to see if I've done it correctly. Thanks and regards. KJP1 (talk) 07:50, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:29:40, 19 December 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Pescobosa

edit


Hi! I'm working on multi-page project for the TV and Internet Production Company "Big Breakfast". They are hoping to upload pages for themselves a company, as well as one for their executive producer Luke Kelly-Clyne and their new show "I Want My Phone". The issue I'm coming across over and over is finding the appropriate links and sources for these figures -- they've haven't necessarily been around long enough, particularly in the case of Kelly-Clyne, to warrant explicit coverage and I'm wondering if there are other listings I can use as sources -- I.E. copyrighted website bios, film/tv credits. Please let me know and thanks!!

Pescobosa (talk) 22:29, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pescobosa, if you are being paid for this project, you must disclose this, preferably on your user page per the guidelines at WP:PAID. JTP (talk • contribs) 22:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Edited after seeing disclosure on draft. JTP (talk • contribs) 22:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, Pescobosa, hate to break it to you, but "they've haven't necessarily been around long enough, particularly in the case of Kelly-Clyne, to warrant explicit coverage" - that's the very definition of not notable enough to warrant an encyclopedia article about them. Tell your boss(es) to stop wasting your time on an inherently futile effort, until these topics start having solid, substantial coverage about them. That's how it works. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:58, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2017_December_19&oldid=817041707"