Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 June 27

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation | Help desk | Archives
Help desk
< June 26 << May | June | Jul >> June 28 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


June 27

edit

08:19:24, 27 June 2016 review of submission by Ajithakumar1693

edit


Hi, I have created a page on Planys Technologies. I faced problems a lot of times to get it published, reasons behind were hyperlink and referencing mistakes. Now i have reviewed everything and resubmitted the article for your refferal please revert back with relevant details for publishing as soon as possible. Thank you


Ajithakumar1693 (talk) 08:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

10:01:57, 27 June 2016 review of submission by 52.30.29.110

edit


I feel that I am getting somewhere with this article, but I am clearly still failing. I am really surprised that IMDB is not allowed, as I did not believe that it is a user site. I have found more articles online, and a couple of books, but I want to be sure that I am going in the right direction before I add more references.

Are the below acceptable?

https://audioboom.com/boos/38494-andy-pandini-talks-about-his-new-play-the-mass-suicide-club

http://www.motmodel.com/Detail.aspx?model_id=3879

http://realdealtheatre.webs.com/apps/photos/album?albumid=6434481

http://www.hollywood.com/celebrities/andy-pandini-58307192/

http://www.slate.com/blogs/quora/2014/03/10/how_does_hollywood_typecast_for_a_movie.html

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/harolds-going-stiff-film-review-609062

http://whatculture.com/film/whatever-happened-to-pete-blaggit-the-british-indie-hit-comes-to-dvd

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=TZorAQAAIAAJ&q=%22Andy+Pandini%22&dq=%22Andy+Pandini%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjKvuW8j6PNAhWlJ8AKHciGCBMQ6AEIJDAB

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=V1-QBQAAQBAJ&pg=PA178&dq=%22Andy+Pandini%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjKvuW8j6PNAhWlJ8AKHciGCBMQ6AEIHjAA#v=onepage&q=%22Andy%20Pandini%22&f=false

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=KoTcBAAAQBAJ&pg=PT267&dq=%22Andy+Pandini%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjKvuW8j6PNAhWlJ8AKHciGCBMQ6AEIKDAC#v=onepage&q=%22Andy%20Pandini%22&f=false

Thank you

Aoife


52.30.29.110 (talk) 10:01, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13:44:53, 27 June 2016 review of submission by Kandsranch

edit


Kandsranch (talk) 13:44, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thank you for your response. I am confused. I had read through the concerns when an article is at jeopardy of not being "at arm's length" and thought I had met the requirements by showing transparency and validating with links to key resources like Forbes Magazine. The Lean Launchpad is currently mentioned on Steve Blank's wikipage but we thought it made sense to separate it since it was adopted by I-Corps which is a government agency program.

What would I need to be more transparent? If I need to note my relationship as an employee of K&S Ranch, where would I do this?

Thanks for taking the time - this is my first wiki experience.

All the best, Erikka Brickey 


Hello, Kandsranch. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Draft:The Lean Launchpad / I-Corps, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products; instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template); when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE); avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM); exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies. In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Worldbruce (talk) 17:36, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

The draft in question is Draft:The Lean Launchpad / I-Corps. Follow the instructions in the paid editing policy as to where you shall disclose your connection. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Kandsranch: As explained in the answer to your question here on 20 June, you have not validated with links to Forbes Magazine. The draft cites three Forbes blogs (www.forbes.com/sites), which, because they are neither peer reviewed nor subject to meaningful editorial oversight, are all but worthless on Wikipedia. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13:57:52, 27 June 2016 review of submission by Nicwin10

edit


My submission was declined because of "not enough reliable secondary sources and too much of a promotional tone." I would very much like to correct this submission so that it will be accepted. Please guide me on what I should change in the content to make it not so promotional. Though I believe that much of the content is factual information describing the programs of this organization.

Nicwin10 (talk) 13:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have an association with the Foundation? If so, please provide the conflict of interest disclosure, and, if necessary, the paid editing disclosure. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

23:24:53, 27 June 2016 review of submission by Evaki1972

edit


Hello. I have been waiting about a month for a review of an article that I worked on with other wikipedia users for quite a few weeks. Just wondering how much longer the wait will be as it said about a week or longer. Thank you very much for your attention! :) Evaki1972 (talk) 23:31, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Evaki1972. Unfortunately, with the current backlog, a month is not an unusually long wait. The good news is that only about 20 drafts have been waiting longer than that, so you should have an answer fairly soon. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Worldbruce. That is wonderful news!! Crossing my fingers! :) Evaki1972 (talk) 23:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2016_June_27&oldid=728406896"