Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 July 18

Help desk
< July 17 << Jun | July | Aug >> July 19 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


July 18 edit

06:27:10, 18 July 2016 review of submission by Geetha akkihebbal edit


Geetha akkihebbal (talk) 06:27, 18 July 2016 (UTC) hello good morning i am disappointed as my article for creating wikipage for: Mr. Suresh kumar T N has been declined. below is the message received. kindly help me how to make changes for "inline citation" i am not a software person and this is my first project. i just included all the authentic news/images/videos/books about"Mr.Suresh kumar" i feel i have not met the Wikipedia's format.kindly help me, i wish to get through this page for submission successfully. kind regards geetha[reply]

Submission declined on 16 July 2016 by GeneralizationsAreBad (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. You are encouraged to make improvements by clicking on the "Edit" tab at the top of this page. If you require extra help, please ask a question on the Articles for creation help desk, ask the reviewer that declined your submission, or get help at our live help chat from experienced editors. Find sources: "T N Suresh Kumar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · HighBeam · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · The Wikipedia Library · NYT · WP reference. Declined by GeneralizationsAreBad 29 hours ago.Last edited by GeneralizationsAreBad 29 hours ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be rejected again. AFC-Logo Decline.svg Symbol opinion vote.svg Comment: Please use the standard inline citation/footnote method. Thank you. GABgab 23:20, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

I can see that you are finding Wikipedia's formatting to be difficult. The problems with your draft that have caused it to be declined have to do with formatting in general and with references in particular. At this point, rather than offer you specific advice, my suggestion is that you play WP:The Wikipedia Adventure to get practice in editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:55, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20:55:31, 18 July 2016 review of submission by Aswieconek edit

Hi, wondering if all of the articles/books we have sourced are considered reliable? If not, hoping we can find out which ones are not reliable. Also, wondering how many more sources we will need. Thank you. Aswieconek (talk) 20:55, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The comment that I have does not have to do with the sources, which look reliable, but that the article needs to be edited to add links to other articles, such as the articles about notable people who are listed as having been photographed by him. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  Accepted Worldbruce (talk) 02:18, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:41:20, 18 July 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Laura bachrach edit


I have edited an article and would like to resubmit for review. I do not see the option to resubmit.

Laura bachrach (talk) 21:41, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to resubmit Draft:Victoria Brynner? Try editing it and see if you can submit it. (It doesn't appear to have been submitted in the first place.) Robert McClenon (talk) 21:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Laura bachrach: Please don't remove earlier AfC reviews or their associated comments. One of the many reasons not to do so is that the resubmission process is built into those reviews (the bright blue button in the big pink box). Old reviews will be removed automatically if and when the draft is approved. Before resubmitting, clarify the sources. The |last= and |first= parameters are for the names of the authors, not the name of the subject. Also, aim for at least three in-depth, independent, reliable sources. Time qualifies, but I'm not so sure about JustLuxe.com. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:41, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Worldbruce: I did not mean to remove the AfC reviews or their associated comments. I am very sorry if this happened. Thank you for your direction and comments! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laura bachrach (talkcontribs) 02:52, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]