Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 August 28

Help desk
< August 27 << Jul | August | Sep >> August 29 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


August 28

edit

09:42:46, 28 August 2016 review of submission by JennyOz

edit


Sorry but I just submitted my first article (from my sandbox) but it was named Draft1 instead of Orange Sky Laundry. What do I need to do to fix my error? JennyOz (talk) 09:42, 28 August 2016 (UTC) JennyOz (talk) 09:42, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I moved your page to Draft:Orange Sky Laundry. You have to move pages to change title. Fuortu (talk) 10:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Fuortu for fixing that for me. JennyOz (talk) 11:23, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

11:18:45, 28 August 2016 review of submission by Dosenbier1990

edit


Hello there,

I tried submitting this draft for the German manager Utz classen: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Utz_Claassen&venotify=created

I got feedback that it does not show sufficient notability.

I am surprised the draft was rejected. Many companies that Mr Classen was the CEO of have their own lengthy wikipedia articles. He was CEO of EnBW, the third largest gas provider in Germany from 2003 until 2007, EnBW. He was also the ceo of Sartorius AG, Solar Millennium and supervisory board member of AWD. He was also president of RCD Mallorca and he's been honored as the "most innovative entrepreneur international 2016" by Günther Oettinger. There is significant media coverage about him and he has a lengthy profile on Bloomberg. I am really wondering what more is needed?

I would like to point out that the CEO of Adidas has its own wikipedia article and the company makes 4 billion less revenue compared to EnBW. In addition, Utz Claassen has completed many other mandates on top.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Hainer

Hence, I plan on resubmitting this draft a third time now.

--Dosenbier1990 (talk) 11:18, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Doesnbier1990. You are welcome to resubmit the article but please take note of what the previous reviews have said before you do so. Regardless of your personal assessment of Classen's achievements, or the inclusion or otherwise of other businesspeople, your draft must be shown to satisfy the golden rule – "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic". Joe Roe (talk) 12:22, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15:10:37, 28 August 2016 review of submission by DHeidtman

edit


DHeidtman (talk) 15:10, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi wiki world I have submitted a draft for approval and declined 3x. First was stating that it was looking more like advertising so it was edited with a significantly neutral tone. Feedback at the time was that it was coming along nicely but rejected again because it was felt not to have enough notability. It was again reworked citing sources as recommended but declined again as it said it again appeared to be advertising. Looking for help! the article is Draft: Alzheon. Thanks DHeidtman (talk) 15:10, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18:56:00, 28 August 2016 review of submission by Badlani Meeta

edit


Badlani Meeta (talk) 18:56, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article in question is Draft:Cleome Barmanni. It has no references. It also has formatting problems, as I noted when I declined it. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:11, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

22:56:16, 28 August 2016 review of submission by Asoulfulperson

edit


Hello, I have attempted to follow the guidelines to get my submission into the following article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirulina_(dietary_supplement) under the research section accepted. However, it keeps on getting rejected and it's not clear why. I am new to this and need guidance so I can submit this article.

Thanks you much.

Your sandbox draft was declined as being about Spirulina (dietary supplement), with the suggestion that any information be added there. You then made one effort to add a large amount of poorly sourced information to Spirulina (dietary supplement), which was reverted as not being adequately sourced. The next step is to discuss on the article talk page, but that is no guarantee that your submission will be accepted, because we have high quality standards for dietary and medical claims. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:50, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]