Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 January 25

Help desk
< January 24 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 26 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 25 edit

11:00:44, 25 January 2015 review of submission by Hqaddomi edit


Hello,

I wrote this article long time and they reviewers asked for reliable references to show the artists' works which I added in the sections "Event" and "References", yet I've been told it's not enough and the resources are not reliable or mentioning the subject although they all are from official sources and all mentioning the artist by name.

Many sources also talks about the artist but in Arabic which I think is not understood by the reviewer but all of them are from official resources. The comment of the reviewer was:

"Event listings are not a reliable source for biographical claims the way you have used them. There are several broken reference links and also references that do not seem to mention the subject at all. It just does not appear that the subject is going to be notable under our standards."

there was only one link that was down, from the source, and it was actually working when submitted but I removed it anyway.

Please help.

Hqaddomi (talk) 11:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19:00:27, 25 January 2015 review of submission by 103.255.232.14 edit


103.255.232.14 (talk) 19:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Write about origination about kochaisa kurmi

103.255.232.14, we can't understand what you're asking. Please provide a link to the page in question, and let us know what your question is. MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:32, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

20:08:51, 25 January 2015 review of submission by Bnotepr edit


Bnotepr (talk) 20:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regards; I hope you can help. I know you guys have a lot of drafts to be reviewed. The reason I am writing is mine is from December 12. I would like (if is possible) to be reviewed, no matter if get no approved (crossing my fingers it does). I re-arrange the article adding more external sources., here is the draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Cirex Thanks in advance Bnotepr (talk) 20:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Bnotepr:   Declined An article about Cirex has been deleted several times over the past few years because Cirex is simply not notable. You would do well to read our notability criteria specific for musicians as well as our standards on what sources are considered "reliable". You fail to make the case. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:43, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

22:59:09, 25 January 2015 review of submission by Klwhfb edit


Hello, thank you for reviewing my article. Can I change my submission from an article submission to a stub submission? We are modeling the submission after the "School Psychology Quarterly" article which is a stub.

Thank you!

Klwhfb (talk) 22:59, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Klwhfb: A "stub" is simply a way to label articles that are very short and require expansion; there is no separate stub submission process, as all stubs are articles and have the same inclusion requirements as any other article. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:10, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]