Wikipedia

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2014 September 10

< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation‎ | Help desk‎ | Archives
Help desk
< September 9 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 11 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 10 edit

02:16:53, 10 September 2014 review of submission by HappyBe edit


I have been trying to submit an article for almost a year, it is a very long time between reviews (which I understand) but then I make changes and get caught out on something else. I am also finding it difficult to ascertain if my article has been rejected or if I am waiting to hear back again. Is there a number I can call or anyway I can get some additional help in getting this article published?

Thank you for your help


HappyBe (talk) 02:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Our role as reviewers is to seek to ensure that an article will not immediately be subject to one of our deletion processes when it is accepted. That is why we push it back to the author. We want to accept articles. Create > Submit >Review > Edit > Resubmit is intended to be an iterative process. IT is not that you get caught on something, it is that the edits that you make reveal another facet that needs to be polished.
There are no numbers to call, no email to check. You need to work on the draft, resubmit it, and await the review.
I have, by the way, filled in the details of the editor who declined the draft most recentluy. Their review is correct and the tone needs to be altered to be flatter. Fiddle Faddle 08:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
On my checking further, the editor who pushed the draft back to you, Wilhelmina Will, had not completed the review task, so you were not notified. I have left them a helpful note on their talk page. Do take their review on board. You may also wish to discuss it with them on their talk page. To me there seems to be just this tone step to go. Other reviewers my have different views. So go to it with your faith restored and let;s get this accepted! Fiddle Faddle 08:35, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:37:21, 10 September 2014 for assistance on AfC submission by Reachlearning edit


I have recently had an article rejected, but can't find the reason why it was. Please could someone help me to get the article posted to Wikipedia.

Thank you

Reachlearning (talk) 06:37, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The rationale is given at the draft itself. Your user name shows that you work for the organisation (0.95 probability). We will review it for you to remove WP:COI, but you must help yourself. Fiddle Faddle 08:18, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

13:11:38, 10 September 2014 review of submission by GimliDotNet edit


Can someone have a look at the AFC. There has been no attempt to improve the article per last reviewers comments, just updates to results. It looks like it's clearly being used as a host page. 13:11, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

GimliDotNet (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) 13:11, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated the page for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:2014–15 Glossop North End A.F.C. season. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 16:10, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

14:25:58, 10 September 2014 review of submission by Waqar Ali Mumtaz Mohammad edit

{{Kill Yourself Save the planet the Islamic Perspective}}

Waqar Ali Mumtaz Mohammad (talk) 14:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC) WHy Was my article declined to add in Wikipedia? I have made it all possible Better article.[reply]

If you go to the page Draft:Kill Yourself Save the Planet, Islamic perspective you can see that it was deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement of an external website. This is because it copied material that may be copyrighted from the external website. All material on Wikipedia must be freely licensed, so such copying is not acceptable. If you own the material on the website and wish to freely license it, Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials explains how to do so. But often, it is better to write it in your own words instead, in a neutral encyclopedic style and supported by independent reliable sources as described in Wikipedia:VRS. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 16:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

15:32:39, 10 September 2014 review of submission by Nadeembahoo edit

After submitting the page, I received this message: It is proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern: 

   NN - Autobiography. Advertisement for his books and website.

I have modified the page and resubmitted but I'm not sure how long it will take for them to review it again. Please assist me so that I can remove/update the information so that page will be created. Nadeembahoo (talk) 15:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of submitting the page as a draft, you appear to have created it directly as a published article. This has thrown up problems because your newly created article does not have references to independent reliable sources ... for example reviews of Bhabha's books in major newspapers or established literary magazines ... to prove Bhabha's notability by Wikipedia's standards. Wikipedia:VRS has more information about this.
Perhaps you should move the information about Bhabha back to your sandbox at User:Nadeembahoo/sandbox and submit it from there only when it is ready. Alternatively, if you can fix the problems with the existing article Nadeem Bhabha within a few days, then that should also work. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 15:57, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

17:34:23, 10 September 2014 review of submission by 69.71.193.130 edit


Can somebody help me figure out why my page was rejected? I am using original content that doesn't have any sources except for the synopsis for which i would like to use the official synopsis. The page is Draft: A Leading Man. Thanks!

69.71.193.130 (talk) 17:34, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:A Leading Man requires references. We require references from significant coverage about the entity, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42. It is one of the very simple things that must exist for a draft to be accepted. Fiddle Faddle 17:47, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]


What if I am the reference? All of the information is first hand.

69.71.193.130 (talk) 17:34, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia does not have first hand information. Unfortunately this might mean that your draft is unlikely to be suitable as a Wikipedia article. However, if this television drama receives significant coverage in independent reliable sources... perhaps such as reviews of it in major newspapers or established entertainment magazines or established entertainment websites, then adding such sources as references may suffice to prove its notability. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 17:56, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If the synopsis you have written is published in WP:RS that will give some weight to its inclusion. If you are a journalist and review the topic in a significant manner and it is published in one or more outlets that qualify for WP:42 that is infinitely better. Even if you are a well known public figure writing anonymously here and you unmask yourself as that figure it remains as original research. Thsi is because WIkipedia is an encyclopaedia and cannot take first hand material. Fiddle Faddle 18:04, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

21:22:42, 10 September 2014 review of submission by Clr65109 edit


I created an account on Friday and it hasn't been confirmed yet. It has been more than four days. It there something else I need to do? Thanks!

Clr65109 (talk) 21:22, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit stuff. Fiddle Faddle 21:25, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

22:15:33, 10 September 2014 review of submission by 192.64.240.200 edit


192.64.240.200 (talk) 22:15, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting re-review for the following article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Jansport_J

Last review on May 14, 2014 by Joe Decker noted leaving the article for another reveiwer. No update since, and not in Pending Reviews queue. Substantial sources added as well.

22:20:40, 10 September 2014 review of submission by 192.64.240.200 edit

Article was last reviewed on May 14, 2014. Reviewer noted that it would be reviewed by another editor. No updates and not listed in any review queues.

192.64.240.200 (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It appears not to have been submitted for review. Choose whichever of these you wish to pursue and hit submit. Fiddle Faddle 22:58, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The second-named page was removed from the pending submissions list by User:Joe Decker with this edit. This Articles for Creation process is tough for reviewers, but also very tough for submitters when inexplicable things like this happen. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 23:19, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
On that basis, please will someone who has an expertise in WP:MUSIC review this article swiftly. It has missed out because of a glitch. Music is not well within my current competence, or I would jump in now it is resubmitted. Fiddle Faddle 07:58, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2014_September_10&oldid=1114267214"