Wikipedia:Update/1/Content policy changes during September 2008

Feel free to edit, but please keep discussions about changes to a page on that page's talk page. Use quotation marks to show which sentences and phrases people can search for to find the changes you list; quotation marks are also useful for giving verbatim changes whose consequences may not be clear, yet. Occasionally, notice of some changes may be deferred a month if there's evidence that the changes may not last.

  • WP:Biographies of living persons
    • Added "External links in biographies of living persons must be of high quality and are judged by a higher standard than for other articles", which seems stronger than the previous "in full compliance".
    • Added "attributions to anonymous sources" as things to watch for.
  • WP:Naming conventions
  • WP:Neutral point of view
    • Added "Minority views can receive attention on pages specifically devoted to them"; removed "In [minority view] articles, the minority view should be described in detail". Also removed "When a clear consensus can be identified in reliable sources indicating that a particular view is a minority or majority view relative to the article's subject or to the general context of the material, it is appropriate to indicate this in the text of the article. It may also be appropriate to contextualize viewpoints relative to their acceptance in various communities which sources indicate to be particularly relevant."
    • Added "Give precedence to those sources that have been the most successful in presenting facts in an equally balanced manner."
  • WP:No original research
  • WP:Non-free content criteria
    • Fair-use rationales should be "specific".
  • WP:Verifiability
    • Added: "The source cited must directly support the information as it is presented in the article." In a footnote: "When there is dispute about whether the article text is fully supported by the given source, direct quotes from the source and any other details requested should be provided as a courtesy to substantiate the reference."
    • Wikipedia mirror sites may not be used as sources. [Added for emphasis; this was already understood.]
  • WP:What Wikipedia is not