Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Final Fantasy Type-0

Final Fantasy Type-0 edit

This is the archived discussion of the TFAR nomination for the article below. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests). Please do not modify this page.

The result was: scheduled for Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 17, 2016 by Brianboulton (talk) 15:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final Fantasy Type-0 is a Japanese video game produced by Square Enix in 2011 for the PlayStation Portable (PSP). It is an action role-playing game where players take the role of Class Zero, a group of fourteen students skilled in magic who become involved in a war between the four nations of Orience. Developed by the same staff as Crisis Core: Final Fantasy VII, Type-0 was designed as a departure from the traditions of the Final Fantasy series with its action-based gameplay and dark storyline. It was originally planned for both PSP and mobile, but the mobile version was cancelled in 2008. Upon release, the game met with commercial success in Japan, and favorable reviews both in Japan and overseas. The first non-Japanese version of Type-0 was a fan translation, released in 2014. A high-definition remaster was released worldwide in 2015. (Full article...)

  • Most recent similar article(s): The most recent similar article is Radical Dreamers on February 2,
  • Main editors: ProtoDrake (editor, nominator), Sergecross73 (editor), PresN (editor)
  • Promoted: November 14, 2015
  • Reasons for nomination: The proposed date is the first year anniversary of the game's official release in the west. Although it is a different version, it is still essentially the same game.
  • Support as nominator. ProtoDrake (talk) 18:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - An excellent new Featured Article on a game so popular it merited a full remake for international release. Also, the editor ProtoDrake needs no introduction for the quality of his articles and the extensiveness of his research. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Sure, why not? However, I would suggest scheduling an article about a video game not produced by Square Enix between this article and Radical Dreamers. sst(conjugate) 08:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:32, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]