Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 May 8

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are currently only 2 parish councils in Gloucestershire with articles namely Cirencester Town Council and Tewkesbury Town Council, all the rest are either red links, redirects or linked to the parish its self. Per WP:EXISTING we may create templates with red links, I add red links to templates however there must be a reasonable prospect that these articles can be created but there isn't. We only have articles on 28 parish councils in the whole of England and while its likely the case more could be created most would not be notable or for the same reason as districts the name only exists for a parish like Ashchurch Rural so similar to WP:UKDISTRICTS it would be redundant to the parish article, see Wikipedia:Notability (councils). Template:Local authorities in Gloucestershire which lists the county and district councils as well as the 2 parish councils with articles does a far better job. It may be a good idea to create templates for the parish themselves like Template:Devon parishes or for parishes and settlements like Template:Babergh. Also while deletion isn't cleanup I'd note it appears to contain errors namely it lists Wyck Rissington Parish Council as being in Gloucester district but its actually miles away in Cotswold district. Note that parish councils can cover more than 1 parish so that may be a thin argument for keeping but given such articles don't tend to exist its unlikely it would be useful for this and the parishes themselves would be a better way of navigating. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:20, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the template on 2023–24 Premiership Rugby with Module:Sports table/Rugby, the template is not needed as no other Premiership season articles use a template and all the ones from the last 10+ years use Module:Sports table/Rugby. LouisOrr27 (talk) 17:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Queen of Hearts (talk) 19:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, implemented directly in articles with WP:LST. – Pbrks (t·c) 14:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2024 May 15. plicit 23:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

User warning templates by 71211.21User

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Speedily deleted per G5. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 13:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to simply be worse versions of existing warning templates, often riddled with grammatical errors. No real purpose for these templates to exist. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete, exact same behavior as now-blocked User:User2802.172 (likely sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/User 28062F033EOF457DC93EEFAABBET2C3). Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 12:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I had a hunch this was someone's sock. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 12:58, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for finding this one! I just reported it at SPI. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 12:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see you just blocked it already. Good call. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 13:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.