Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 September 18

September 18 edit

Template:Short discription edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be content created in the wrong namespace. Gonnym (talk) 18:24, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete as created in the wrong namespace or as a test page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:58, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • If I had seen this in the first instance I probably would have moved it to Draft:Sarabjeet Singh without leaving a redirect, rather than going to a deletion discussion. Since we're here, though, delete * Pppery * it has begun... 00:15, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll refrain from speculation per AGF, but please delete anyway. Not a valid use of the namespace, and nowhere to subst. Folly Mox (talk) 01:40, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Itsyoursingh (director) was WP:A7'd two days before this template was created, and Draft:Itsyoursingh was abandoned. Sarabjeet Singh might refer to a different guy. SWinxy (talk) 15:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete template not needed for this, as it's not used usefully anywhere. Even if it were used in one place, it should be substed there. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:19, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Liverpool Departments edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete per this discussion and the prior discussion Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:00, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

three or fewer team links, per prior discussion (not counting links to an article about the sport, which doesn't count as a team link). Frietjes (talk) 14:08, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 17:23, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and recent TFDs. GiantSnowman 17:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom – I also added two templates of Argentine clubs with no links to other clubs' departments. Fma12 (talk) 09:51, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Links in prose or the 'See also' section would be a suitable replacement. SWinxy (talk) 15:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment @Frietjes and Fma12: you cannot add more to this nomination after discussion/!voting has happened, as you have done here and here (you also changed the section name???). Please self-revert and re-nominate for a fresh discussion. GiantSnowman 07:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok, I'll revert my addition. BTW, I did not modify any name. Fma12 (talk) 09:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as long as they do indeed have 3 or fewer links. I checked a handful and they all met this criteria, but not going to go through every one. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Characters in One Piece edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:13, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to Template:One Piece as all blue (non redirect) links are listed there and used on those articles. Gonnym (talk) 12:09, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.