Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 October 13

October 13 edit

Template:2024 Southeastern Conference baseball standings edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:50, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it a little early for this template? This is the only spring 2024 standings template we have for baseball for any conference or league. It would seem more appropriate to create these in 4 to 6 months. Liz Read! Talk! 17:55, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Some editors in the sports side seem to be in competition who gets the credit for creating empty templates and create these basically carbon copies of previous years even a year in advance. There is no value in having these unused for so long. Gonnym (talk) 06:50, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see any encyclopedic value of having this template half a year before it could ever be needed. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:37, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:1979 Canadian federal election/Trois-Rivières edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:49, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article table with no template parameters. Subst into article and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:34, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • weak keep, I have fixed the template and added it to Claude Lajoie. however, there are so many of these, we should really consider them more than one at a time. I don't see a particular reason to delete this one and keep the others that have a low number of transclusions. Frietjes (talk) 19:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst on the original article. The results templates added on the bio article just bloat up the page making it longer without making any improvements in regards to information about the subject. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 02:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:19, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Single-use. Despite a last-ditch effort to add it to another article, this is unreferenced and shouldn't spread around. -- Mikeblas (talk) 22:35, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Koreanic languages edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:38, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Covered already by Template:Korean language toobigtokale (talk) 00:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Template:Korean language per nominator; this is pretty straightforward. I'm also not a fan of the messy POV statements being made at the bottom of the template. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:36, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gun laws table edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a single-use template. Mikeblas (talk) 21:11, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as long as the table doesn't get deleted from the main article it's on. It's good information just only really useful on that article toobigtokale (talk) 20:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can think of no use cases for this template apart from the article it's already in. TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 01:39, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.