Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 March 4

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< March 3 March 5 >

March 4 edit

Template:TVreview1/heading edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Gonnym (talk) 23:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TVreview2 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template for a process that stopped working in 2007. Gonnym (talk) 23:15, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Global F.C. squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:39, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

team is not active; no need for current squad template Joeykai (talk) 22:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:User:Killarnee/display-no-mobile.css edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per WP:G7. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:42, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong namespace, should be in userspace Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:50, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This should be WP:CSD#G6: Just move into their userspace without a redirect? Terasail[✉️] 16:00, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that css templates must be in the template namespace. But anyway I just saw that it's almost a duplicate of Template:If mobile/styles.css, so it can be deleted. Killarnee (talk) 18:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
requested G7 deletion but as it is a css the template won't work. Bedivere (talk) 21:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PD-VenezuelaGov edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 March 21. Izno (talk) 03:54, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DoneU edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:49, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete, since there are only seven uses of this template[1] and {{Done}} exists. This template adds nothing and should be deleted. Terasail[✉️] 13:13, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - it adds convenience, as described in the documentation.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  16:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It creates an WP:EGG link. {{Done}} is perfectly fine here. Gonnym (talk) 18:31, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • When {{Done}} with something, it's common and courteous to ping the requester. {{DoneU}} does this more quickly and intuitively than {{Done|{{U|Example|done}}}}. If the user is really concerned about WP:EGG, they can just change done to something more to their liking, like hey, Example, it's done. "Problem" solved.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  21:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    See my response for the fixed template below, it applies to both templates. Terasail[✉️] 21:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, per above, no need for an EGG. Frietjes (talk) 20:30, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sim racing edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:49, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A navbox based upon racing software / racing video games. Arbitrary distinction between "legacy", "active userbase" and "currently developed". It is unnecessary, we don't have navboxes based upon video game genres and this seems like a random collection of games. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:33, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FixedU edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:49, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete, since there are only two uses of this template[2] and {{Fixed}} exists. This template adds nothing and should be deleted. Terasail[✉️] 11:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - it adds convenience, as described in the documentation.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  16:20, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It creates an WP:EGG link. {{Fixed}} is perfectly fine here. Gonnym (talk) 18:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • When something is {{Fixed}}, it's common and courteous to ping the requester. {{FixedU}} does this more quickly and intuitively than {{Fixed|{{U|Example|fixed}}}}. If the user is really concerned about WP:EGG, they can just change fixed to something more to their liking, like hey, Example, it's fixed. "Problem" solved.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  21:21, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    From what I have seen around, it is common practice to ping the person after the template (Even more so with the replytool being a thing now) For example: "  Fixed @Terasail" rather than combining the fixed template with the ping. Links within the "Fixed" text are normally reserved for diffs and such to show the edit which "fixed" the issue. Terasail[✉️] 21:42, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, per above, no need for an EGG. Frietjes (talk) 20:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_March_4&oldid=1145814729"