Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 March 28

March 28 edit

Template:Josip Broz Tito edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:49, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{Josip Broz Tito series}}. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Not redudant. There are a lot of world leaders who have both a series sidebar and navboxes. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:03, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, but delete the sidebar instead. footer navigational boxes are superior for navigation because the don't take away space for other right-floating content like images and infoboxes. Frietjes (talk) 22:12, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep both: Sidebars and navboxes co-exist for many topics and series about people, and I don't think any guideline (i.e. WP:NAVBOX) discourages nor requires use of both simultaneously (where sidebar doesn't fit). –Vipz (talk) 15:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2012 Summer Paralympics wheelchair rugby templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:50, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

per the current convention for Olympics and Paralympics articles, the game and standings templates should be hosted in the parent article, and not in individual templates. if consensus changes over LST vs templates, we can always put all the matches and standings into a single template with a switch so we don't need to watch 25 templates per event. Frietjes (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support There is no need to have these as templates given the alternative. CRwikiCA talk 19:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and previous discussions. Nigej (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Desert Diamond Cup standings templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I converted these to WP:LST per earlier WP:FOOTY discussion and transcluded the template calls from the group page instead. CRwikiCA talk 16:41, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2019–20 UEFA Youth League Group tables edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and already included on 2019–20 UEFA Youth League group stage as transcludable tables. CRwikiCA talk 15:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Nick Jr co-productions edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:20, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously doesn't look like a standard navigational template, and it's problematic. Bossy Bear is a redirect to a bad article for something that is not Nick Jr. co-production, and Pinky Dinky Doo and Wow! Wow! Wubbzy! do not appear to be Nick Jr. co-productions at all. Reason for deletion? This is a test--not a successful one. Drmies (talk) 00:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WWW and PDD are co-productions and Bossy Bear is a co-production as it isn’t animated by the Nickelodeon Animation Studio DaRealToonChance (talk) 00:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Plus WWW is co-produced with Nickelodeon America as it was one of the shows shown at there 2006 upfront and Nickelodeon was associated with it DaRealToonChance (talk) 00:58, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).