Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 March 15

March 15 edit

Template:Nations at the 2009 Asian Youth Para Games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to Template:NOC in 2009 Asian Youth Para Games. Contains no links to any articles. The Japan link is just a redirect to the main article about the 2009 games. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete al redlinks, and unlikely many or any of these articles would be created and pass WP:GNG. Thus, template is not needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:07, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022 Winter Olympics curling convenience template navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No longer needed as all the templates have been deleted. The navbox navbox links to the curling convenience navbox. So both are no longer needed. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:00, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:United States nuke plant map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 March 23. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Netball at the Arafura Games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:50, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All blue linked entries in this navbox are up for deletion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netball at the 2001 Arafura Games. This is a non notable event and lacks WP:SIGCOV and doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG. Ajf773 (talk) 09:34, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:24, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as all former blue links are now red (apart from the parent article itself, which is at AFD), there is no need for a template. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Press Hit Play edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:49, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This navbox serves no purpose as is. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom, serves no purpose. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:11, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ken Suson navbox edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One directly-related article. Primary claim to fame is as member of SB19. A separate navbox is not needed yet. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:36, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom, serves no purpose. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1st.One edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:47, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are no articles that relate to the band besides the article for the band itself. No reason for this to exist yet. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:24, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom, serves no purpose. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:12, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SIMBAD DB edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:SIMBAD link. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and redundant to Template:SIMBAD link. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 02:22, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep, it's used Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomical objects/Catalogues/Collinder catalog and Wikipedia:WikiProject Astronomical objects/Catalogues/Bright Star Catalogue. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:29, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I only see Template:WPASTRO-SIMBAD on that page. That is a different template. This one appears to be unfinished and unused. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:20, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's because {{WPASTRO-SIMBAD}} calls {{SIMBAD DB}} Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:27, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fernando Alonso series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:52, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sidebar has one like to outside the subject and the rest are redirects or article sections links. The navbox has one link to an Alonso related outside the title link. This is not an appropriate use of a sidebar and navbox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:35, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete not useful. Pelmeen10 (talk) 09:55, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete both are just a collection of links vaguely related to him, rather than a series of articles specifically related to him. As such, neither template is useful. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Diet of Japan Fukushima electoral districts edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and only three links to articles for the subject. Fails NENAN regardless. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:31, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Damon Hill edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:46, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and two links of relevance outside the title for the subject. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:28, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - as unused, per nom. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:52, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete just a collection of links vaguely related to him, rather than a series of articles specifically related to him. The links to his family are already wikilinks in the article too. In summary, template is not required for this. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:06, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).