Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 June 29

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< June 28
June 30 >

June 29 edit

Template:Writers from Uzbekistan edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is content that belongs in a category (or maybe a list article, if the redlinks are desirable to spur article creation), not a navbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Handball at the 2023 Central American and Caribbean Games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:15, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only 2 blue links, not necessary to have Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:24, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, all of them are red links and is way too soon. Vitaium (talk) 12:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep pending creation of the subject articles, which could happen soon. It seems strange to single out this template when editors have created many sports templates for 2024 and 2025 (see Wikipedia:Database reports/Unused templates (filtered)/1) that will not be used for at least six months. This template should have been created after one or more of the articles existed, but the games are happening right now (link to handball results from yesterday). If this sidebar is still only red links in a couple of months, I would recommend deletion pending creation of the linked articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:34, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Clone High edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Izno (talk) 02:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All links are included in Clone High's infobox. Painting17 (talk) 17:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - there is now a character article. (Oinkers42) (talk) 17:36, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    There's one article based on a character, and then a list of characters. I certainly enjoyed the show, but two Clone High-related articles aren't enough to warrant a navbox. Painting17 (talk) 13:14, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    There are five. Clone High itself, obviously, the list of characters page, pages for Cleo and Gandhi, and Glenn (the Janitor from Scrubs, who appeared in the first season in a guest role, and silently in the second season). More than enough pages to justify a template. Lo Chiamavano (talk) 17:17, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment After removing unrelated links, the navbox still does not merit remaining. All these links can be accessible on the main article for the show. A navbox has to be more than a simple list, it must provide navigation outside of easy links found on articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:11, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, used on 9 pages. Frietjes (talk) 15:05, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vitaium (talk) 02:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak keep. Just about meets WP:NENAN. --woodensuperman 07:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Now used on six pages but all links are easily reached through the main article for the show and from the list of characters article. The navbox is not meeting any criteria of navigation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:49, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coordinate edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 01:46, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is this template useful or exact copy of {{coord}}? This template is use to translate German to English coordinate. Should it just be a redirect to {{coord}}? Vitaium (talk) 01:17, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, but convert to a subst-only translation template. It appears to use {{coord}} to actually display the coordinates; it should be converted to use {{coord}} in the wikitext instead of remaining as a non-standard way of transcluding coordinates in pages. Frietjes might be able to help make the substing work correctly. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • keep, but add {{subst only|auto=yes}} so a bot will auto substitute it. it's already setup for substitution, so just need to make it auto. Frietjes (talk) 15:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I just substituted about 600 of them. Frietjes (talk) 17:58, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, but convert as Frietjes recommends. That way it would be more useful. Bermicourt (talk) 15:59, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_June_29&oldid=1163841406"