Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 January 6

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< January 5 January 7 >

January 6 edit

Template:St Kilda Football Club Seasons edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was history merge. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:53, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:St Kilda Football Club Seasons with Template:St Kilda Football Club seasons.
the lower case "seasons" version is being used, but the history from the upper case "Seasons" should be merged into it? Frietjes (talk) 23:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Brynäs IF roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Formerly single-use roster list templates. All substituted on respective team pages. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:25, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Okayama Yunogo Belle squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amateur team without notable players (red links). Pelmeen10 (talk) 21:02, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2000 RLWC Group A edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merged on the respective 2000 Rugby League World Cup article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:07, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - No evidence that there was a consensus to merge.Fleets (talk) 18:35, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete, single use tables which should be merged with the parent article. Frietjes (talk) 02:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 20:54, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete I concur with Frietjes - there's no clear reason for these to be separate templates, and not even Fleets provides one (this discussion will be the evidence of consensus requested if it is closed as delete) * Pppery * it has begun... 21:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canadian federal election, 2006/Newton—North Delta edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use. Substitute on the respective article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:33, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Still single-use. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 20:52, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canadian federal election, 1979/Champlain edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus error fixed (1974 table changed to 1979 table) Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:30, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Information on respective district article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:29, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subst as this is one a single page. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 20:52, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Alberta provincial election, 2004/Edmonton-Whitemud edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus now transcluded on two pages. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:29, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use template. Substitute on respective article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:28, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Still single-use. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 20:51, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CHN-1862 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused flag icon templates. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:43, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 20:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1992 Winter Olympics calendar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:15, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Took the liberty of substituting it on 1992 Winter Olympics. This would have been a single-use template had it been on the article. Credit has been given to the sole editor, the creator in my edit summary. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:45, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2013 under-21 provincial championship group A table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 17:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-use. Substitute on respective article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:38, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:CS Pandurii Târgu Jiu squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS Pandurii Târgu Jiu is a defunct football club. Pelmeen10 (talk) 17:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Xerez CD squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Club plays in amateur level, only 1 transclusion. No updates for a while. Pelmeen10 (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FC VSS Košice squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FC VSS Košice is a defunct football team. Pelmeen10 (talk) 15:46, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Once Municipal squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

C.D. Once Municipal is a defunct football team. Pelmeen10 (talk) 15:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Big stub edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a template with no apparent use created by now-indeffed account. - Who is John Galt? ✉ 15:36, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FK BSK Borča squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Plays in full amateur level, contains old squad list Pelmeen10 (talk) 14:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FK Dinamo Vranje squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FK Dinamo Vranje is not an active football team. Last played on amateur level. Pelmeen10 (talk) 13:34, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Metrod edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This template allows the easy creation of links in the format [[STATION NAME (SYSTEM)|STATION NAME]]. That style of naming is deprecated and there is presently one transclusion at {{Donetsk Metro}}, easily replaced. Mackensen (talk) 12:26, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No objection. Note that {{metro}} has the same functionality. Useddenim (talk) 16:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EZnum edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 January 15. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PlayStation key press edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:51, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Used on a handful of user pages, plus exactly one mainspace article. And it looks terrible there, with the large button icon completely overpowering the body text it's placed inline with. The template was nominated once before, and while the result at the time was "keep", RL0919's closing summary said in part: Keep for now pending future use, but if it continues to be unused I would anticipate renomination within a few months. Well, it's taken thirteen years, but given the continuing lack of use, complete lack of aesthetically desirable use, and unlikelihood of increased use in the future, who is this template even for? FeRDNYC (talk) 06:52, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Fine by me (creator). Probably just want to sub it out for the literal "Circle button" on that article. (for what it's worth, this was quite a bit more subdued on creation.) Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Thumperward: Apologies, I didn't mean to imply (though I realize that I absolutely, totally did) that the template was always aesthetically awkward, nor that it was never useful. My logic was more along the lines of Izno's point: that Wikipedia has evolved away from articles/writing-styles that would be likely make use of it now or in the future.
    (SMcCandlish put a bunch of work into updating the design in 2018. I can't figure out why, as I don't get the impression it was very widely-transcluded then, either. But I did feel a bit guilty nominating this in the wake of that (recentesque) effort.) FeRDNYC (talk) 22:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I must've been bored or something.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  08:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I've removed its only mainspace use as the specifics in the article are in the realm of WP:GAMEGUIDE. We don't write like that on Wikipedia video games articles (anymore). Izno (talk) 21:11, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Izno. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:36, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per all the above.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  08:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bicol Spicy Oragons roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:34, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused roster of a non-notable team. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:32, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 06:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coins (Spanish card suit) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:34, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:25, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:LNR edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:34, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:46, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Medal "For the Defence of Odessa" edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and nothing has changed since the last nomination three years ago. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:43, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Relentless jas edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template using a quote with a reference, but not used as one anywhere on here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Saudi Arabian Army Officer edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:01, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tbilisi Neighbourhoods edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and only two links to articles on neighborhoods in Tbilisi. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:53, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Public holidays in NSW edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 January 15. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ICD-10 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content. Subst into article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:13, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Puerto Ricans Olympic Medallists edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with no template code. Subst into article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:50, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • KEEP-This well designed and written template has been here for a long time and deserves to stay as such. It contains information and links to the article of those who are mentioned in it plus serves the reader as a connection to those interested in the subject. --Tony the Marine (talk) 21:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Marine 69-71, take a look at WP:SUBST. The content won't go away, it just won't live in a place separate from its only article. Izno (talk) 21:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Izno (talk) 21:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Subst and delete This is article content that belongs on the article. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:28, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, please, as I just spent a bunch of time cleaning up the version that's already been subst'd into Sports in Puerto Rico. FeRDNYC (talk) 00:40, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Usersign edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:33, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Redundant to {{unsigned}} and similar. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:44, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sunparks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:34, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no blue links in the body. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Seemore edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:35, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used on about four discussion pages and appears to be redundant to {{hidden}}, which has about 350,000 transclusions. If the close is "delete", it may need to move to the holding cell to ensure that this template and its companion table-closing markup are replaced without breaking the pages. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Adaptive lead gallery edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:32, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2015. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_January_6&oldid=1152210090"