Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 January 2

January 2 edit

Template:Same date edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:56, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just one transclusion on a user talk page. Subst and delete. Before deletion, there is useful MOS-related discussion on this template's talk page that might benefit from being moved back to the user's talk page from whence it came. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lang-mkd edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 21:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Empty template with no transclusions. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:17, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Equation begin and Template:Equation end edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or categories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The author of this 5-year old unused template enthusiastically supports it deletion --Guy vandegrift (talk) 21:52, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Interstate 91 extension edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. I see that the amount of code in the template would be too much to add to the article. Rschen7754 18:47, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only used once, should be substed and deleted. Rschen7754 18:43, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:North Macedonia edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 21:28, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a simple invocation of a flag template, with no template parameters. It should be replaced with the actual invocation of the flag template. If it is kept, it needs documentation and a category. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, for the same reason we have deleted the other full country name templates (confusion between flag templates and topics navboxes). we already have a flag template, and it's {{MKD}}. Frietjes (talk) 15:50, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:39, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Arleigh Burke-class destroyer Flight IIA armament (5"/54, SeaRAM) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 January 9. plicit 21:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox NCAA Division I ice hockey season edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Infobox NCAA ice hockey season. plicit 21:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Infobox NCAA Division I ice hockey season with Template:Infobox NCAA ice hockey season.
Pretty much identical templates, and the second already has the necessary switches for linking properly. I had BOLDly redirected this a few days ago, but the creator has reverted meI was reverted so here we are. Primefac (talk) 09:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC) Edit: Updated to indicate that it was not the creator, but someone else. My apologies for the mistake. Primefac (talk) 17:13, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).