Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 February 7

February 7 edit

Template:Men's Olympic water polo tournament statistics – finishes in top four edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:59, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unused after merging with the parent article with attribution, and updating transcluding articles to use WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 19:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Newspapers in Samarkand edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:59, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No main article for this navbox. No blue links in the navbox body. Delete or userfy until some of the articles exist. It looks like List of newspapers in Uzbekistan is a good place to start. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Comparison of embedded computer systems on board the Mars rovers edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:59, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single-article content with no template parameters. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:47, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The content is useful and supported by sources, it's probably better to move the table to the article and delete a template. Artem.G (talk) 20:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sites of Specific Scientific Interest in Wales edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:58, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicates or POVFORK of Template:Protected areas of Wales and in any case is in error. It is sites of special scientific interest. Unnecessary duplication leading to template clutter. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 08:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - relevant template already exists. Template title has no rational meaning.  Velella  Velella Talk   09:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Neutral - It is definitely a relevant template for the 12 sites in Wales. Would also be happy for "Protected areas of Wales" template to cover these instead. Titus Gold (talk) 14:12, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment - Thanks for that. Just to be clear, though, there are in excess of 1000 SSSIs in Wales. It is a lot more than 12 sites. 12% of the area of Wales is in an SSSI. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 03:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Metro Bacolod edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Three links and unused. The links are already better served by other navboxes. No utility in having a template for just 3 links. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:07, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Per nom, the links would be better served in navboxes. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The links are already present at Template:Negros Occidental. Gonnym (talk) 12:24, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mattapan Line edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 23:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. Gonnym (talk) 12:23, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).