Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 September 2

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< September 1 September 3 >

September 2 edit

Template:6TeamBracket-2xtobeatQF edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:47, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to {{6TeamBracket}} –Aidan721 (talk) 22:57, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • This was replaced to the aforementioned template as an "improvement". Style wise though, the template under deletion hides the 2nd game of the quarterfinals/first round, while the replacement uses dashes. I would've preferred hiding it as that looks to be a cleaner look that having random dashes. If that feature is done here, I have no problems deleting this. Howard the Duck (talk) 00:18, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's sorta-related template, {{4TeamBracket-RP}} deals with this better. See, for example, UAAP Season 84 men's basketball tournament#Bracket (hidden), NCAA Season 97 seniors' basketball tournament#Bracket (with dashes, and somewhat clumsier explanation to the tournament format, without links to the proper sections.) This also used the "universal" word for championship round of a competition "Final", a term rarely used in the Philippines unless you're a pompous dude whose parents own large estates, while the term "Finals'" or "Grand Finals" (non-sports competitions) are the ones that are used. Howard the Duck (talk) 00:27, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Howard the Duck: I believe you can hide omitted score cells can be hidden with the parameter |hideomittedscores=2. – Pbrks (t • c) 04:47, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I cannot seem to make it work; whether or not there's a 2nd game is determined independently per each match-up. Until that's resolved I cannot support this. Howard the Duck (talk) 04:53, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Howard the Duck: I just tried it and it works. It should look something like {{6TeamBracket|legs=3|hideomittedscores=2.... – Pbrks (t • c) 05:07, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I tried doing this to 1997 PBA Governors' Cup and it doesn't work, and in fact screws up the bracket, with the semifinal results being removed. In this tournament, the quarterfinals/first round only has a maximum of 2 "legs", not three. Howard the Duck (talk) 05:17, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Howard the Duck: I've edited the page. Is that how you expected the bracket to look? – Pbrks (t • c) 05:27, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Great, that's how it should look. This can be deleted now, but I suppose documentation for the replacing template should be cleared up as it's not easy to get this done. Howard the Duck (talk) 05:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom – Pbrks (t • c) 04:47, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:American Film Institute Award for Best Film edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, only The Lord of the Rings is the true "winner" out of this list. For every year except 2001, the AFI lists alphabetically the 10 best films of the year, meaning that the movie that is on top of the list is not the only winner, but one of the ten. Leo Mercury (talk) 22:18, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:13, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:TNT: there are too many awardees to list in this basic-format navbox. I could think of three ways to go next: either rebuild the template from scratch to list all 10 winners for each year, replace this with a category tree, or walk away from it all. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:41, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cutc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to be redundant to {{time|df=iso}}, except that this one adds an "h" to the time and does not pad days correctly. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Current iOS 15 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 September 15. ✗plicit 12:14, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cercanías Sevilla lines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:46, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Cercanías Sevilla. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:56, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Şehir Hatları color edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:45, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Şehir Hatları. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:48, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:İDO stations edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/İDO. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:43, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/Circumvesuviana left/Sorrento edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:44, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, no incoming links, no documentation. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_2&oldid=1110430268"