Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 20

October 20 edit

Template:Yellow9 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Unclear what this template is for. Created in September 2022, so it may still be in development. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:21, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Automotive industry in Peru edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 28. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2014 United States attorney general elections imagemap edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete but can be restored in user/draft space if someone wants the templates Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Only one incoming link, shortly after creation, to ask about troubleshooting a problem with the template. Created in June 2021. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Userfy The creator is the one who has been creating these attorney general election articles. These will come in handy when MrOinkingPig gets around to creating the 2014 and 2015 articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:04, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ÖBB-IC lines edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:45, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/ÖBB Frietjes (talk) 15:43, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pwc soe edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 06:37, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Used only in one editor's user subpage. Created in 2010. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BS-numgrid edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 06:37, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead: It’s not needed any more. Tuvalkin (talk) 10:32, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
F.t.r., its original use has long been moved to c:BSicon/Catalogue/others2#Numbers_and_letters. Tuvalkin (talk) 10:34, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Eugene de Blaas edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:37, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NENAN The Banner talk 18:28, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Almost there... it needs at least two one more article. Write on! Randy Kryn (talk) 13:54, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • weak keep, easier to use than see also links in each article. Frietjes (talk) 22:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Usually, related items are not counted towards the desired number of five relevant links. The Banner talk 16:36, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:45, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • 'Related' entries, if closely related to the topic, have been counted in the "unofficial five" rule. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:27, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try for a fifth possible article to be included in this navbox.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 01:28, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep, but I would suggest to invite fellow Wikipedians to expand it until the minimum five entries, that I think should be paintings. Its not possible to give a warning to the user who started the template about the minimum five entries, because he was already blocked. Please also take a look at Template:Guido Cagnacci, with only two entries, one of them a single painting. Please give a warning to the user who started it never to do it again. A template needs at least five entries.Mistico Dois (talk) 02:29, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:School-leaving age edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 27. plicit 06:38, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).