Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 12

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< October 11 October 13 >

October 12 edit

Template:Before date edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:10, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was originally going to be bold and simply redirect this to {{Show by date}}, which does the same thing (shows one set of text until a date, then a different set of text after the date) but the syntax is just different enough that it would require wrapping/replacing, and that goes past what a simple bold move is good for, so here we are. This template is barely used (likely because of better functionality of the other template). Primefac (talk) 13:23, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Primefac: Perhaps "barely used" but you just broke User:Arjun G. Menon/Userboxes/My Time for the 617 users who trandsclude it. Please fix. – wbm1058 (talk) 23:14, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  Done with a simple <noinclude>...</noinclude> addition (which you could have done yourself, fwiw). I'm not sure why those pages aren't showing up in the transclusion list for this template, though. Primefac (talk) 08:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Merge to {{Show by date}}. Rather than write a wrapper, Primefac, you might be able to find and modify a small handful of pages manually, since it appears that this template is mostly called by other templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:08, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, I had outright replacement as a possible option, just not one I wanted to carry out on 30+ pages without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete after replacing with {{show by date}}. I already fixed the use in {{before EDT}} which was the majority of the transclusions. Frietjes (talk) 23:12, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Sports table/WL goal points edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused module. –Aidan721 (talk) 13:11, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:R to unified talk page edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:R from remote talk page. ✗plicit 06:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Basically identical with {{R from remote talk page}}, and should be redirected. Clyde State your case (please use {{reply to|ClydeFranklin}} on reply) 03:38, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 09:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bahnlinie ST and Template:Bahnlinie-BB edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. Possibly replaced by Module:Adjacent stations as part of the big {{S-line}} upgrade project. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BS15 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:51, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Unlikely to be used. The links in {{BS templates navigation}} only go up to {{BS10}}, which is used in only four articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:49, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_October_12&oldid=1117109902"