Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 November 9

November 9 edit

Template:Typeset edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:55, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2018; does not appear to have been adopted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:55, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete On top of it not being adopted it seems like a bad idea and likely to lead to excess non-breaking spaces. --Trialpears (talk) 00:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country data Ottoman Empire Plain Flag edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary fork that is easily called using {{flag|Ottoman Empire|red}} or something very similar. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:38, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was made more than a year back and concur that the template should be deleted.
Crecy1346 (talk) 17:31, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rapidpg edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No longer functional after this March 2022 TFD. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Alphabetizing edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Alphabetizing looks like a snow delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:14, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:John Cain Jr sidebar edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 November 16. plicit 00:52, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Beyond the Unified Model edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 00:51, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links from discussions. No main article for this sidebar, which reads like gibberish to me, possibly WP:OR. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:06, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).