Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 November 1

November 1 edit

Template:Noble nicknames edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of the alphabetical pages listed in this template were deleted in an AFD discussion so I don't think the template really serves a purpose any longer. It's only transcluded on one article now which is also listed on this template. Liz Read! Talk! 21:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cite BBC Sport football edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was created and used by me briefly when the BBC Sport website was still in http mode, the website now uses https and I don't think anyone uses the template anyway so it will make sense to delete this template from the project. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Stub 2.0 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:49, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One transclusion on the creator's user page. No documentation or categories. Created in 2021 and has not been adopted. Userfy, or subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not in use on any articles according to the insource tool [1] Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:49, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Soccer club stats edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:51, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No documentation or categories. Created in 2018 as an experiment. Discussed on one editor's talk page, where it was quickly decided that it was not a good idea. Subst and delete. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as the creator of that page and discussed back in 2018 with Struway2, I don't think that was not in use since then so it would be excellent to remove the template from the project. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 21:38, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infinity Ward edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:59, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox based upon developer Infinity Ward. The studio has so far only developed Call of Duty games, for which the encompassing {{Call of Duty}} suffices. I don't believe this one is needed. I've also nominated {{Sledgehammer Games}} for the same reason. I'd nominate them together, but it's not easy to do on a mobile phone. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 19:36, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Sledgehammer Games edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:56, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox based upon developer Sledgehammer Games. The studio has so far only developed Call of Duty games, for which the encompassing {{Call of Duty}} suffices. I don't believe this one is needed. I'm also nominating {{Infinity Ward}} for the same reason. I'd nominate them together, but it's not easy to do on a mobile phone. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 19:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).