Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 May 21

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< May 20 May 22 >

May 21 edit

Template:Electronic music-footer-list edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:59, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template is not used anymore. Solidest (talk) 18:15, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BIA edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links no longer work; station search at biakelsey.com doesn't function Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The site went back up, but who knows how long it will stay like that? Ljcool2006 (talk) 20:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah it's back up, but Google marked it as "not secure" (no HTTPS). Do you have to have HTTPS for a template link? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:11, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The website may be back up, but it provides so little information as to be useless. BIA/Kelsey is in the business of providing financial information about broadcast properties, and most of that is of course only available to paid clients. The FCC public files run rings around this with the directory-type information provided. Further, it looks like they're on an outdated part of the site about to fall off the vine at any time. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cpbl score game edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{Cpbl score game}} was used incompletely on 2008 CPBL season but I replaced it with standings summary instead as much of the information was blank or missing. {{Cpbl stadiums}} and {{Cpblteams}} are used only by {{Cpbl score game}}. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:13, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Powerade Tigers roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roster template for a defunct basketball franchise. Only transclusions are on one page, and redirects. No obvious other uses; subst and delete. fuzzy510 (talk) 15:46, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AirAsia Philippine Patriots roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Roster template for a defunct basketball franchise. Only transclusions are on one page, and redirects. No obvious other uses; subst and delete. fuzzy510 (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Editnotices/Page/Boston edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A wicked funny April Fool's joke, but in its current form it's blank. No reason to preserve it in the Hahvahd Yahd. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:43, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It's wrapped in {{If April Fools}}, so it only appears on April 1 (thus why it's currently blank). Also useful to preserve as some editors like to browse past April Fools jokes. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 19:52, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I passed by this on my way to cleaning up *mbox, but I am inclined to delete it after someone else has nominated it. I don't think it's appropriate to be joking about this in the mainspace, per much April Fools precedent. --Izno (talk) 17:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete If someone feels the need to seriously nominate an April Fools joke for deletion, then that's evidence that it is more disruptive than funny and should be deleted. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pppery, what specifically is the disruption? Has someone changed the spelling of words at the article on April 1 because of it? (Note that it includes a clear [April Fools!] tag for responsible disclosure, making the chance of that miniscule.) Has it disturbed maintenance efforts? The nominator noted only that it was currently blank, which as I noted above is actually evidence it's functioning properly (TPH, given that, I'm curious whether you still wish to delete at all). Pppery, as with your other recent nominations of April Fools-related material, you claim hypothetical disruption without evidence. Responsible jokes help make Wikipedia a pleasant community, and I'd rather we preserve them than delete all evidence of them, preventing future editors browsing WP:APRIL2021 from a chuckle they might otherwise have. This editnotice appears one day a year, in a form that could not possibly be misconstrued by a reasonable editor as anything other than a joke. (If "Editors who pronounce Rs in this article may be blocked and/or thrown into the harbor" doesn't register as humor, there are CIR issues.) There is no harm. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 05:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is a consistent stance that I apply to all April Fools' jokes (and have in several other cases: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimir Putin, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Willy on wheels) not an evaluation of the merits of one specific template -- the disruption is that someone, for whatever reason, felt compelled to start this discussion which is sufficient given that I view the value of April Fools jokes as neutral at best. * Pppery * it has begun... 12:29, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd urge you to place a little more than zero value on responsible humor, even if you don't personally find it funny. We're not paid, so the only thing keeping us here is that we enjoy editing. Many editors find enjoyment in Wikipedia humor, and it motivates them to keep on contributing, so even if that's not true for you personally, you should want to keep it around, as it helps us with retention. I take a very hard stance on attempts at humor that could confuse readers or disrupt editors, which we absolutely need to stamp out, but the flip side of that is leaving completely harmless jokes like this alone. And I maintain that this is completely, utterly harmless—your main argument otherwise seems to be that because you are fighting to delete it, it's disruptive and should be deleted, which is tautological. Please focus your efforts to combat disruptive humor where they're actually needed instead. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 22:45, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment The nominator stated it was blank, for the deletion, which it isn't, since it is locked away except on April Fool's; so "more disruptive than funny" doesn't seem to fit for nominations of blank pages. -- 65.92.247.17 (talk) 02:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • delete, we should keep the April Fools' jokes out of article space (including edit notices shown to editors in article space). Frietjes (talk) 19:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Muntinlupa Cagers roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:36, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only one transclusion, with no obvious other uses. Subst and delete. fuzzy510 (talk) 14:41, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Public transport sign edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 28. ✗plicit 12:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Old English vowels edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:10, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single used article content hidden in a template. This should be subst to the article and the template deleted. Gonnym (talk) 11:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fast food sign edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:16, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template does nothing, and hasn't for over 7 years. It previously included a graphic in the source article, but that was removed in November 2014 when the graphic was deleted from Commons. Imzadi 1979 → 11:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy delete as WP:G8, dependent on a deleted page. This template has no reason to exist without that file. -fuzzy510 (talk) 01:44, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • G8 speedy Useless without the template, and also not standard with any WP:HWY road guide, either. Nate • (chatter) 05:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Quezon City Capitals roster edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:46, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only one transclusion, with no likely additional uses. Subst and delete. fuzzy510 (talk) 09:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Qormi F.C. squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:44, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amateur team and not updated. Only red links there and in the team page. Pelmeen10 (talk) 06:57, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom Hhkohh (talk) 06:09, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_May_21&oldid=1091523289"