Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 June 23

June 23 edit

Template:Fb disc header 2.5 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sport(?) header template. Gonnym (talk) 21:39, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete duplicate. Quoting template author response from their usertalk:
This template is needed for team with 3 competitions per season. Please advice if there is such template as there is only 2 or 4 competitions per season template were found. Fuiyoh (talk) 15:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
Believe they were looking for the (not intuitively named) {{Fb disc header 5}} but couldn't find it, so ended up making their own version.
Comment: That whole family of templates could use some reorganization under a single parent with unified documentation.
-- 2406:3003:2077:1E60:C998:20C6:8CCF:5730 (talk) 11:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Third Place:Destubbing:Women in Red October 2019 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, and no chance of future use, since it is tied to a 2019 event. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:32, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pop density/LoffAonSoff edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sub-template of Template:Pop density. Probably was part of the template pre-Lua. Gonnym (talk) 21:19, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ram tracks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This is article content that has a better version at the album's page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:35, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Comics infobox sec/lang edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:39, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

template's limited functionality replaced with {{ISO 639 name link}}; no longer transcluded in article space. Trappist the monk (talk) 13:36, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ranks and Insignia of NATO Air Forces/WO/Blank edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused (and unlinked to from anywhere) empty rank templates. These are unnecessary as if a new template is needed to be created, a used template can just be copied and edited. Gonnym (talk) 07:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rank of UK/CDT/ADCC edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:57, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused UK related rank templates all but one created by the same user. I checked a couple and it seems they have similar templates which are in use:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

More Canadian elections edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Single use election templates should be deleted, the results table should be in the article. Yilku1 (talk) 03:30, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).