Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 July 19

Eurovision Young Dancers one year templates

edit
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Techie3 (talk) 00:54, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These navboxes were created under the assumption that these countries would compete more than once in the event. Since that did not materialize and no new events are taking place (since 2015), there is no chance that these will grow. Additionally, the four main articles of each navbox were recently redirected for the same reason. Each navbox largely consists of crossed out links to events that the subjects did not participate in. Grk1011 (talk) 21:01, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:13, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only one instance of this event 5 years ago (2017) and subsequent editions never materialized. Navbox has consisted largely of red links since its creation in 2016. Its parent article has also been a redirect since 2016. Grk1011 (talk) 18:45, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Out of the many links that are (or used to be) part of this navbox, only 3 articles exist: Eurovision Dance Contest, Eurovision Dance Contest 2008, and Eurovision Dance Contest 2009. The rest are redirects. With the contest canceled over 12 years ago, it is unlikely that more articles would be created to make this navbox helpful. Grk1011 (talk) 18:33, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox whose main article was deleted. Most of the entries in this navbox do not mention "Star Circle". – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:23, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unused and having no apparent use. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just a link to Bačka. Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:53, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This isn't a sensible template. Did someone try to make a link with the wrong type of brackets? 192.76.8.85 (talk) 00:43, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 26. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:35, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G6 by Izno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 20:17, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused edit notice template. Possibly unnecessary as a friendly message when editing other users' user pages. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. 192.76.8.85 (talk) 00:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:11, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing but two image files uploaded on Commons by creator. Nothing useful here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:43, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No idea what this is supposed to be, but it isn't a useful template. 192.76.8.85 (talk) 00:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 26. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:13, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re-created after Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 19#Template:Tribl with the addition of one link. It still does not navigate sufficient quantities of articles. Izno (talk) 06:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:13, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with no main article and no links to articles. One article could be linked, but that looks like the only possibility. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:07, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a navigation template full of red links that therefore serves no useful navigational function. WP:WTAF. 192.76.8.85 (talk) 00:53, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 11:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Discussed on one page in 2015 but not currently used. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:46, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 26. Izno (talk) 04:55, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 26. Izno (talk) 04:55, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 July 26. (non-admin closure)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:41, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).