Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 February 7

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< February 6 February 8 >

February 7 edit

Template:Mumbai City FC departments edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. The more comprehensive {{Mumbai City FC}} is used instead. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Mumbai City FC has an inline version. Personally I'm not a fan of these. A navbox is a better approach, especially since only a small minority of readers are going to be interest in 2nd team/youth stuff. Nigej (talk) 07:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NBL SKP edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Links to Southern Melbourne Saints, which does not contain the string "puma" and which already has a team template shortcut at {{NBL SKS}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Surely this system of creating umpteen 1-line templates needs to be changed. Based it seems around {{NBLMatchSummaryLine2}}. Nigej (talk) 08:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: not that I understand why sports teams need a template to handle linking unlike everything else on the wiki, but if we really, really need a system like this, then we can use something like {{NBL team}} (as the name, not the infobox it currently redirects to) to at least reduce it to one template. Gonnym (talk) 18:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, there's no need at all. Just use the team name. If a team changes it's name we can handle that with a redirect, all this stuff is completely pointless. Nigej (talk) 20:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:GMA Artist Center edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, possibly due to some related category or article moves. {{GMA Network Inc.}} is more comprehensive, although it does not contain all of these links. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Borderline promotional, mainly listing the members of the board. Nigej (talk) 07:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Weiya edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:57, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused Chinese calendar date templates. I've imported 3 of the missing to Module:Calendar date/events so functionality is preserved. Gonnym (talk) 08:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Electorates of New Zealand, 2002–2008 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up to comments made at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 31#Template:Electorates of New Zealand, 2020–2026. The problem with them is that are only used at parent articles like 2005 New Zealand general election which already contain the complete list in the article. They never appear in the child articles like Auckland Central. So overall they don't have any navigational benefit. Nigej (talk) 08:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no objection to deletion, but would these serve a worthwhile purpose if they were transcluded into each respective electorate article? — HTGS (talk) 19:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The trouble is that we'd end up with more and more navboxes in each article. Nigej (talk) 20:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The usage of these navigation template is not to reproduce content but to offer navigation between related articles. Template:Electorates of New Zealand and Template:Historical electorates of New Zealand do that. There is no need for the creation of these each N years. Gonnym (talk) 07:58, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pluto compared edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and Pluto#Mass and size uses a much simpler approach to show the same image. Nigej (talk) 08:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Plymouth Canada timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. One of those unintelligible style of timelines. See Plymouth (automobile) for ones that are used. Nigej (talk) 08:40, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Governors General of Canada timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused except that it appears as a link at {{Governor General of Canada}} as if it was an article. The reality is that List of governors general of Canada covers the subject and this adds nothing. Nigej (talk) 08:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canon RF Mount zoom lenses timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox in the style of a timeline. Replaced by {{Canon RF Mount Lenses Timeline}} (see below) Nigej (talk) 09:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canon RF Mount Lenses Timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:59, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox used in just 1 article Canon RF lens mount and with nearly all red links. Also the timeline approach is not suitable for a navbox which is entirely focused on navigating between articles. Nigej (talk) 09:15, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Canon EOS MILC cameras edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox in the style of a timeline. Duplicated by the last part of {{Canon EOS digital cameras}}. Nigej (talk) 09:22, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My proposal was initially to split the two timeline "DSLR" and "MILC" to avoid one enormous timeline, like i said here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Canon_EOS_digital_cameras#Split_Timeline_DSLR_and_MILC Gribouilleuse42 (talk) 11:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fiat Automobiles timeline (Europe) 1960-1989 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and replaced by {{Fiat timeline 1940-1979}} and {{Fiat timeline 1980–2019}}. Nigej (talk) 09:28, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of the history of Chile edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline that adds nothing to {{Chile topics}} and the articles that link from there like Timeline of Chilean history. Nigej (talk) 09:36, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Japanese era names edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions but links from Japanese era name#Overview. Timeline that duplicates {{Japanese era names}} which is much clearer. Nigej (talk) 09:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The used template is much more clearer. Gonnym (talk) 07:56, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rover vehicles timeline since 1980 edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:00, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Superseded by {{Rover, MG, BL Austin and BL Land Rover vehicles timeline since 1980}}. Nigej (talk) 11:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rabbinic timeline edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Superseded by {{Rabbinical eras timeline}}. Nigej (talk) 11:42, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Indeed superseded by said template. Debresser (talk) 17:25, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pontiac timeline 1950s to 1980 (detailed version) edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Basically the same as {{Pontiac timeline 1950s to 1980}}. Nigej (talk) 11:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 07:55, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2006 Commonwealth Games netball convenience templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:09, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see that at eg Ice hockey at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Men's team rosters#Canada we're using named sections and then at Canada at the 2022 Winter Olympics#Ice hockey we can use {{#section:Ice hockey at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Men's team rosters|CAN}} to get the content there. Seems a much better approach than the misnamed "convenience templates". I have converted the templates at Netball at the 2006 Commonwealth Games to this style and those listed are now unused. I know this is a drop in the ocean compared to the thousands of these we have but it seems to me that, as a minimum we ought to be putting an end to future creations of these "convenience templates"'. Comments would be appreciated, especially links to earlier discussions. Nigej (talk) 12:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Having created similar templates for the 2022 Games (as you know) I felt they were a useful tool, not knowing about the use of named sections at the time. Now, I agree your approach is more efficient and the above templates are no longer needed. Edvid (talk) 15:17, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I was the one who created all of the above templates back in 2012 when this was this way be displayed this content across several pages. With the section links now used these can be deleted. – Ianblair23 (talk) 06:05, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Smithfield Foods edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar for Smithfield Foods. Overly detailed and unusable. Nigej (talk) 13:32, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Socionics table edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:43, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused table relating to Socionics. Socionics#The 16 types looks like it has a table covering this. Nigej (talk) 13:39, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Bill character biographies toc edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:08, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as the articles they were used on were redirected last year. Gonnym (talk) 14:06, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:League memberships TPS edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:45, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. League positions of the Turun Palloseura soccer team in graphical form, from where it was deleted some time back. Covered by Turun Palloseura#Season to season. Nigej (talk) 14:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:League memberships of Eintracht Frankfurt edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:51, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Vertical timeline of the league positions of Eintracht Frankfurt. Covered by Eintracht Frankfurt#League results etc. Nigej (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Learningblocks edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:57, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused WP:NAVBOX with just 2 links. Both articles are accessible from the other's infobox. Nigej (talk) 14:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. In a situation like this a see also section would be enough. Gonnym (talk) 07:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:List LDS Temple Australia Map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused maps after the navboxes they were used on were deleted. Gonnym (talk) 15:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:A-League 2012-2013 map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map of soccer team locations. The {{A-League 2012–2014 map}} style seems to be preferred and is used at 2012–13 A-League. Nigej (talk) 15:17, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Arsenal F.C. hit singles edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox covered by the "singles" line in {{Arsenal F.C.}}. Nigej (talk) 15:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have no recollection at all of creating this and don't see any reason for it to be kept given that it has been merged into another template -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:30, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:38, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 18:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Arizona engineering colleges with ABET-accredited programs edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused navbox. We have an article ABET but I can't believe this is a defining aspect of these colleges. Nigej (talk) 15:31, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Shooting WR 10RT20 Junior Women Individual and related shooting record templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:24, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of these templates are either unused (16 of them) or single-use article content. I recommend subst (as needed) and delete for all of them. There are a few remaining templates in the misnamed Category:Shooting junior women's world record navigational boxes that are used in two or more articles. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/IRE-BW left/50 and other migrated S-line templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Migrated to Module:Adjacent stations. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:57, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Attitude Era series edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 February 15. Izno (talk) 00:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:S-line/Montreal Metro left/1 and other unused Montreal Metro rail templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Migrated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Montreal Metro. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, per past consensus of Adjacent stations migrations. BLAIXX 00:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vietnam Provinces Image Map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:23, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused map replaced by {{Provinces of Vietnam}} (see edit history of this) at Provinces of Vietnam. Nigej (talk) 17:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coord/display/display=inline,title edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The edit summary at creation says "created to catch potential errors", but it is not needed. Wikipedia:Database reports/Transclusions of non-existent templates will show transclusions of this template name, and it is checked and cleaned out multiple times per week by gnomes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 07:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Coord/display/inline,title edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of these templates are remnants of the pre-Lua version of Template:coord. They are no longer transcluded except in a couple of sandboxes and talk page archives. Some of them existed only to generate error messages. They can all be deleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:00, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Gonnym (talk) 07:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Oslo Metro and Tramway next edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Appears to duplicate, or be an unused fork of, {{Oslo Metro next}}. – Jonesey95 (talk) 19:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Even {{Oslo Metro next}} seems like a likely candidate to to be replaced with {{Adjacent stations}} Gonnym (talk) 07:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Malaysia political leader sidebar templates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 00:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A number of related sidebar in Category:Malaysia political leader sidebar templates. The problem is that most are only used in one article (1 in none, 2 in two) so fail an important aspect of a WP:SIDEBAR. If there's really a "series" of articles the sidebar would appear in many articles. The reality is that these are designed for use in one article with a long list of other articles that the person is noted in. not "a grouping of links used in multiple related articles". Nigej (talk) 21:08, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try and see if the sidebars can be used. Generally, these political figures are intertwined in the same political events so it's a little problematic when you have to add 2-3 sidebars in the same article, for instance. PenangLion (talk) 07:03, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. A majority of links are related in passing and feels very SYNTH and OR-ish. And none of the individuals have their own categories which adds a level of making these sidebars unnecessary to have. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:08, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:New York Cosmos squad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

team is on hiatus; there is no current squad Joeykai (talk) 22:21, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete The league has restarted without them, so best deleted I think. Nigej (talk) 07:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:38, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 18:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_February_7&oldid=1071910656"