Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 December 24

< Wikipedia:Templates for discussion‎ | Log
< December 23 December 25 >

December 24 edit

Template:Cathead light cruisers of edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:42, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single use. Creator was globally locked. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:55, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yuin-Kuric languages map edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Single use. Subst and delete. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MiniTestTemplates edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:53, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Old cruft from 2006 filled with redlinks and only used on a couple of user pages. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kulaura-Shahbajpur Railroad edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 January 1. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:54, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Image of proximal fractures of the 5th metatarsal edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:43, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article content that should not be in a template. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As creator, I agree it's not really needed. It was helpful when creating the content, as I only needed to update one location, but now that it has stabilized, I've now replaced the template with the wikitext in the articles where it was used. Mikael Häggström (talk) 03:54, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Beacon Brook Routemap edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:55, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Using routemaps for rivers is unconventional. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox treaty/TemplateData edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 15:57, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should be on the doc page. Izno (talk) 19:27, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Uncontroversial. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 22:08, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    It's apparently not uncontroversial, given it was kept at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 April 8. My position has not changed in 5 years, so delete * Pppery * it has begun... 23:06, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. What is the valid deletion rationale here? I don't think anything has changed since the previous TFD. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:30, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jonesey95 I don't think the discussion last time was valid for this page at all. Where X was intended to live is irrelevant, this isn't a multi-use template, it's out of order for the rest of our template documentation, the fact we duplicate documentation is an entirely separate and broader issue, WP:AINTBROKE isn't particularly valid at TFD if anywhere at all (because I think removing the TemplateData from its own page improves Wikipedia not least for the same motivations as removing single-use templates does; keeps the namespace 'cleaner' and helps people to find other templates), there's no plan to fix it is "subst it, fin", and that it uses JSON doesn't make it not documentation, that makes it machine-readable documentation. And said documentation can be edited with a machine-provided GUI, so anyone interacting with it isn't interacting with the machine part.
    Which I think is actually all of everything in that discussion. The only point that is maybe of interest is 'multi-use' templates like "collapse top", but even in that context I think I'd strongly advise two separate TemplateData, because "collapse bottom" surely needs no TemplateData at all. But that's not relevant here anyway. Izno (talk) 21:34, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, I think my comment should/could motivate a re-nomination of each of those earlier templates. Izno (talk) 21:37, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:29, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dependency of Grenada edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:32, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only on entry. Fails navigation. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Guardian-class patrol boat design section edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article content. Izno (talk) 04:37, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Citation Style documentation/usage custom edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no obvious reason to use. Izno (talk) 04:37, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Guardian-class patrol boat background section edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:35, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article content. Izno (talk) 04:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Guardian-class patrol boat edit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:34, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is atypical, at-best, even for lengthy military navboxes to be placed in the template space. Izno (talk) 04:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I've never been a fan of splitting infoboxes into their separate templates, even though it's standard in some other fields. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:29, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Lenticel (talk) 00:55, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_December_24&oldid=1130909543"